Epstein Secrets

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

t that the plaintiff was injured, see United States v. Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

PC 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ADLIQUI J. BENAVENTE mina MamANVISTIGATOR JESSICA GOMEL BOEBIE M. MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN-BARIND BETTY STOKES PAMUOAtS RITA H. Bv0NYK OF COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI OP COONS1L Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Roy and Marty: This letter represents my thoughts on

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that g violation of an enumeration secti

t that the plaintiff was injured, see United States v. Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ADELQUI J. BENAVENTE PARALEGAL/INVESTIGATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHUE STOKIN-BARING BETTY STOKES PAM I IGALS RITA H. BUDNYK OP COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI OE COUNSEL Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Roy and Marty: This letter represents my thoughts on

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that g violation of an enumeration secti

t that the plaintiff was injured, see United States I. Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ADELQUI J. BENAVENTE PARALEGAL/INVESTIGATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHUE STOKIN-BARING BETTY STOKES PAM I IGALS RITA H. BUDNYK OP COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI OE COUNSEL Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Roy and Marty: This letter represents my thoughts on

igations as you understand them under the NPA. As you know from past experience, and as Mr. Acosta previously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Ann Sanchez (on December 19, 2007), the language of 18 is "far from simple," and, in certain respects, subject to si

iously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Ann Sanchez (on D

, FL 33130 Re: Epstein Matter Dear Bob: June 15, 2009 ADELQUI J. BENAVENTE PARALEGAL I IN WIETIOATOR BARBARA M. McKENNA ASHLIB STOKEN•BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEOALS RITA H. BUDNYK OP COUNSEL On June 8, 2009, Kathy Ezell wrote a letter to me regarding outstanding fee payment issues. At page 3, she

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

est that the plaintiff was injured, see United Stated, Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ADELCOJI J. BENAVENTE PAPALEGAL/INVISTIOATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN•BARINO BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RJTA H. BIJDNYK Of COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI OE COUNSEL Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Roy and Marty: This letter represents my thoughts

obligations as you understand them under the NPA. As you know from past experience, and as Mr. Acostuaviously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Sanchez (on December 19, 2007), the language of 18 is "far from simple," and, in certain respects, subject to signi

iously acknowledged in letters to my partner Ken Starr (on December 4, 2007) and Lilly Sanchez (on Dece

ffrey Epstein Case No. 09-CV-80802-Marra/Johnson Dear Ms. ADELQUI J. BENAVENTE PARALEGAL/ INVESTIGATOR BARBARA M. McKINNA ASHLIE STOKEN-BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RITA II. BUDNYK OP COUNSEL As you are aware, I am Mr. Epstein's attorney in the civil cases that have been filed against him. While I

delivery of any such letter, however, it should only be made by a third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of th

.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R. ALEXANDER ACas-rn UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY EY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Eckstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4 Ewen Afloat Ft 33132

Miami, FL 33130 Re: Epstein Matter Dear Bob: June 15, 2009 ADELQUI J. BENAVENTE PARALIOAL/M55113.700. BARBARA M. McYJNNA ASHUB SIDKEN•BARMO BETTY STOKES PAPALZO&L1 RITA H. BUDNTIC Or COUPRIA On June 8, 2009, Kathy Ezell wrote a letter to me regarding outstanding fee payment issues. At page 3, she

delivery of any such letter, however, it should only be made by a third party service, not by law enforcement agents. Finally, as you know, Judge Starr has requested a meeting with Assistant Attorney General Fisher to address what we believe is the unprecedented nature of the § 2255 component of th

.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida R. ALEXANDER ACas-rn UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY EY FACSIMILE Kenneth W. Starr, Esq Kirkland & Ellis LLP 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Jeffrey Eckstein Dear Mr. Starr: 99 N.E. 4 Ewen Afloat Ft 33132

Miami, FL 33130 Re: Epstein Matter Dear Bob: June 15, 2009 ADELQUI J. BENAVENTE PARALIOAL/M55113.700. BARBARA M. McYJNNA ASHUB SIDKEN•BARMO BETTY STOKES PAPALZO&L1 RITA H. BUDNTIC Or COUPRIA On June 8, 2009, Kathy Ezell wrote a letter to me regarding outstanding fee payment issues. At page 3, she

l power- houses who have worked for Epstein, including Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clin- ton investigator Kenneth EFTA00183073 Starr. Lefcourt is a past president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Epstein§ local defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, issued

A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP May 25, 2010 ADELQ0 J. BENAVENTE PARALEGAVINvISTIGAToR JESSICA C.ADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN•BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RITA H. BuDNYK or COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI or COUNSEL Honorable Edward B. Sent by email and Akerman Senterfitt by U.S. Mail to Jud

ll Clin- ton investigator Kenneth EFTA00233356 Starr. Lefcourt is a past president of the National A

y email and by U.S. Mail to Judge Davis only ADELQVI J. BENAVENTE PARAUGAtliNVESTIGATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN•BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RITA H. BUDNYK OF COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI Of COUNSEL We are in receipt of Mr. Josefsberg's letter to you dated May 21, 2010. We conf