Epstein Secrets

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

t that the plaintiff was injured, see United States v. Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

144837 (E.D. Cal., 2010) (indicating that the statute in effect at the time of the violation governs the minimum damage remedy)? Black. Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf. P.A. EFTA00722000 Jeff Sloman Es . March 5, 2010 Page 3 3. Whether personal injury is a separate §2255 element from the predicate offense el

fforts by former President Bill Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00204882 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 received letters f

in which the word "Epstein," "Kellen, "Ruboyo," "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," "Villafana, " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez," "358 El Brillo Way" appears and which are connected to or related to Jeffrey

cument was served on October 3, 2011, on the following via US Mail and E-Mail Transmission: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. Respectfully Submitted, S/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. EFTA00204891

fforts by former President Bill Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00205383 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 received letters f

in which the word "Epstein," "Kellen, "Ruboyo," "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," "Villafana, " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez," "358 El Brillo Way" appears and which are connected to or related to Jeffrey

cument was served on October 3, 2011, on the following via US Mail and E-Mail Transmission: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfu

fforts by former President Bill Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00205296 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 received letters f

in which the word "Epstein," "Kellen, "Ruboyo," "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," "Villafana, " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez," "358 El Brillo Way" appears and which are connected to or related to Jeffrey

: [email protected] E-mail: ann marie c villafana@usdo' ov Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfu

fforts by former President Bill Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00205887 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 received letters f

ied to, or sent by Reinhart in which the word "Epstein," " "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez," "358 El Brillo Way" appears and which are connected to or related to Jeffrey

500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami FL 33131 Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfully Submitted, S/ Bra

fforts by former President Bill Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00207798 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 received letters f

to, or sent by Reinhart in which the word "Epstein," " "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," a. " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "358 El Brillo Way" appears and which are connected to or related to Jeffrey Epstein, J

500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfully Submitted, S/ Br

fforts by former President Bill Clinton, Andrew Albert Christian Edward (a/k/a Prince Andrew, Duke of York), Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, Jay Lefkowitz, and Roy Black on his behalf. EFTA00209784 9. On January 10, 2008, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 received letters f

in which the word "Epstein," "Kellen, "Ruboyo," "Morrison," "Visoki," "Rogers," "Hammond," Roxburgh," "Villafana, " "Florida Science Foundation," "Starr," "Black," "Goldberger," "Jeffrey," "Australian," "Lewis," "Sanchez," "358 El Brillo Way" appears and which are connected to or related to Jeffrey

cument was served on October 3, 2011, on the following via US Mail and E-Mail Transmission: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfu

ibit 39 (May 15, 2008 letter by the head of CEOS to Epstein's counsel overruling their objections), see Motion, Exhibit 96 (May 19, 2008 Letter from Kenneth Starr, Esq. to DAG Mark Filip seeking further review). The Government properly determined for their own interests in the event that there was a future pr

ion, Exhibit 96 (May 19, 2008 Letter from Kenneth Starr, Esq. to DAG Mark Filip seeking further review).

erg cc: Assistant U.S. Attorney y's Office 500 South Australian Ave Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Roy Black, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 7 EFTA00621915

lemental privilege log (DE 216- 1), with regard to supplemental box No. 3 (P-013504 to P-013507). The entry here reads: "File folder labeled `Mtg w/ Ken Starr, RAA, JS, Drew' containing handwritten notes by A. Marie Villafaiia." Kenn Staff, of course, is a defense attorney who represented defendant Epstein

3 of the supplemental privilege log (DE 216-1), with regard to Suppl. Box #3 P-013342 to P-013350. The entry reads: "File folder entitled `12/05/07 Starr to Acosta' containing drafts of 11/30/07 letters from A. Acosta to K. Starr and from J. Sloman to J. Lefkowitz re performance and victim notificati

1 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E-mail: Dexter.Lee0,usdoi.gov E-mail: Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 [email protected] Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors Roy Black et al. Respectfu

is not inconsistent with our belief that the required scope of waiver was to a predicate offense in the singular, see, e.g., Mr.Acosta's letter to Ken Starr, December 4, 2007, p.2 ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at trial, the plaintiff-victims would not have to show that a violation of an enumeration secti

est that the plaintiff was injured, see United Stated, Scheidt, supra (finding each to be a separate element) and the letter from Mr. Acosta to Mr. Starr, supra December 4, 2007 letter at p.2 which agrees that Mr. Epstein can contest the injury element under the NPA ("were Mr. Epstein convicted at tr

144837 (E.D. Cal., 2010) (indicating that the statute in effect at the time of the violation governs the minimum damage remedy)? Black, Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00194767 Jeff Sloman, Esq. Bob Senior, Esq. Marie Villafana, Esq. March 5, 2010 Page 3 3. Whether personal injury is a separate §2