Epstein Secrets

rneys to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex. V. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, wrote to Messrs. Leflcowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate." Ex. I. Mr. Roth also told Epstein's attorneys that their allegations of pros

. The NPA itself was attacked on a number of grounds, including the provision for compensation of Epstein's victims. Ex. K, Nov. 28, 2007 Ltr. from Kenneth W. Starr to Assistant Att'y Gen. Alice S. Fisher. The Government cannot be faulted for properly recognizing that the NPA might be set aside by the efforts o

presented Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2. (Id.) This placed both petitioners on notice that Epstein would be pleading guilty on June 30, 2008, in Palm Beach Circuit Court. Petitioners' arguments and the record in this case simply do not establish that there was any violation of the petitioners' right to confer. See a

rneys to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex. V. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, wrote to Messrs. Leflcowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate." Ex. I. Mr. Roth also told Epstein's attorneys that their allegations of pros

. The NPA itself was attacked on a number of grounds, including the provision for compensation of Epstein's victims. Ex. K, Nov. 28, 2007 Ltr. from Kenneth W. Starr to Assistant Att'y Gen. Alice S. Fisher. The Government cannot be faulted for properly recognizing that the NPA might be set aside by the efforts o

epresented Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2. (ti) This placed both petitioners on notice that Epstein would be pleading guilty on June 30, 2008, in Palm Beach Circuit Court. Petitioners' arguments and the record in this case simply do not establish that there was any violation of the petitioners' right to confer. See a

ressional intent"); see also Letter from Kenneth Starr, Esq. to John Roth, June 19, 2008 (attached as Ex

of this case fall squarely outside the heartland of those [federal] statutes — in fact, in law, and in congressional intent"); see also Letter from Kenneth Starr, Esq. to John Roth, June 19, 2008 (attached as Exhibit _J. Defense counsel also urged the USAO-SDFL to respect the long-recognized "Petite Policy,"'

wo Petitioners, represented by the same counsel as in the instant case, filed civil complaints for damages against Mr. Epstein in federal court and Palm Beach Circuit Court. See Doe v. Epstein, 13 EFTA00299033 Case No. 08-80893-Civ-KAM (S.D.Fla.) (DE 1); L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 09-81092-Civ- KAM (S.D.Fla.) (DE 1);

ng in light of the legal power- houses who have worked for Epstein, including Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clin- ton investigator Kenneth Starr. Lefcourt is a past president of the. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Epstein's local defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, issu

aire money manager now facing an indictment and prison time stemming from allegations of sexual crimes with underage girls. Many insiders believe Starr—the prosecutor in the Clinton-Lewinsky sex scandal—will work his powerful connections to get Epstein excused of the charges. STARR TURN Ken Eps

documents in Epstein deal sit( lick-2-List. BY ... .s:1N SPENCER-WENDEL Palm Beath Post Staff Writer Thursday, June 25, 2009 WEST PALM BEACH — A Palm Beach Circuit Court judge win again consider today whether to tmseal a deal that purponed billionaire Jeffrey Epstein struck with federal prosecutors to avoid charges b

Il ONE ' r me Ifr, 4--, Event Vic Damone Starr; Was (helm itrt 015(15510/1 BOOK SIGNING Wednes

unseal documents in Epstein deal By SUSAN SPENCER-WENDEL Palm Beach Post Staff Writer Thursday. June 25, 2009 Ct PRINTTHIS WEST PALM BEACH — A Palm Beach Circuit Court judge will again consider today whether to unseal a deal that purported billionaire Jeffrey Epstein struck with federal prosecutors to avoid charge