Epstein Secrets

hold names like Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Ken Starr, and Alan Dershowitz, to lesser known individual

black book"— thought to be a diary of his houseguests or people in his social circle, ranging from household names like Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Ken Starr, and Alan Dershowitz, to lesser known individuals like film producers, fashion executives, magazine editors, and others. See, e.g., Nick Bryant, He

P records qualify as law enforcement records. But, as the Government cannot help but acknowledge, courts in this circuit—like the Ninth Circuit and the D.C. Circuit—have squarely rejected that per se approach, instead requiring a rational nexus to enforcement of a federal law. See Human Rights Watch v. Dep't of

hold names like Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Ken Starr, and Alan Dershowitz, to lesser known individual

black book"— thought to be a diary of his houseguests or people in his social circle, ranging from household names like Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Ken Starr, and Alan Dershowitz, to lesser known individuals like film producers, fashion executives, magazine editors, and others. See, e.g., Nick Bryant, He

P records qualify as law enforcement records. But, as the Government cannot help but acknowledge, courts in this circuit—like the Ninth Circuit and the D.C. Circuit—have squarely rejected that per se approach, instead requiring a rational nexus to enforcement of a federal law. See Human Rights Watch v. Dep't of

ressional intent"); see also Letter from Kenneth Starr, Esq. to John Roth, June 19, 2008 (attached as Ex

of this case fall squarely outside the heartland of those [federal] statutes — in fact, in law, and in congressional intent"); see also Letter from Kenneth Starr, Esq. to John Roth, June 19, 2008 (attached as Exhibit _J. Defense counsel also urged the USAO-SDFL to respect the long-recognized "Petite Policy,"'

ity is "at its most limited when reviewing the Executive's exercise of discretion over charging determinations." Id. In Fokker, the question before the D.C. Circuit was whether the district court had the power to decline to enter a speedy trial waiver because it believed that the terms of the DPA were too lenie