Epstein Secrets

which as Drew politely reminded me, is required under the law. (Exhibit 44). On September 7, 2007, USA Acosta, FAUSA , CEOS Chief and I met with Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, and Lilly Ell (Exhibit 5). At the meeting, Mr. Starr focused primarily on federalism/policy arguments, and Mr. Epstein's backgroun

On September 7, 2007, USA Acosta, FAUSA , CEOS Chief and I met with Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, and Lilly Ell (Exhibit 5). At the meeting, Mr. Starr focused primarily on federalism/policy arguments, and Mr. Epstein's background. I remember Mr. Starr thanking me for bringing § 2255 to their attent

d numerous emails and conversations (mostly via telephone and possibly some in person) with members of the defense team. USA Acosta had contact with Ken Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, Gerry Lefcourt, and Alan Dershowitz. FAUSA had contact with Alan Dershowitzi • Lefcourt, and Lilly . Criminal Chief had contact

ed to address the Court. I cited the CVRA and other statutes to support the Court's authority to hear from them. The second case was United States.. Oliver, which was the Office's first case seeking the appointment of I guardian ad litem (GAL). Through these cases, I researched statutes, cases, the USA

s Office (Exhibits 83 and 84). I never received a response from the Sheriff's Office. 30 Gauger also said that Jack Goldberger had threatened that "Ken Starr and the whole crew" would sue the jail if Epstein received less favorable treatment than others (id). 31 1 do not recall whether Alan Dershowitz or

er to USA Acosta. (Exhibit B-9). USA Acosta asked Mr. Lefkowitz to discuss the matter with Jeff Sloman and me. (Exhibit B-10). On December 5, 2007, Kenneth Starr and Jay Lefkowitz wrote a letter to USA Acosta requesting an updated victim notification letter incorporating their objections. (Exhibit B-11). On

ructing me to send out that notification (Exhibit B-49). On June 23, 2008, DAG Filip completed his review, and John Roth sent a letter to Attorneys Starr and Lefkowitz stating their finding that there was no abuse of discretion and no misconduct (Exhibit B-44). I immediately sent an email to Jay Lefk

ked to address the Court. I cited the CVRA and other statutes to support the Court's authority to hear from them. The second case was United States' Oliver, which was the Office's first case seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem (GAL). Through these cases, I researched statutes, cases, the USA

ng in light of the legal power- houses who have worked for Epstein, including Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clin- ton investigator Kenneth Starr. Lefcourt is a past president of the. National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Epstein's local defense attorney, Jack Goldberger, issu

aire money manager now facing an indictment and prison time stemming from allegations of sexual crimes with underage girls. Many insiders believe Starr—the prosecutor in the Clinton-Lewinsky sex scandal—will work his powerful connections to get Epstein excused of the charges. STARR TURN Ken Eps

i i by the time I joined it in 1977, people were still talking about the good old Gilmour days. EFTA01682757 _My close friend was his second son, Oliver, who is a conductor, who like his siblings was very close to his parents. In fact, the Gilmour family was a strange one. For England, that is. They

the story. Continued Reporting: U.S. Court Convicts Founder of Neo-Nazi Group for Plot to Destroy Baltimore Power Grid The Jerusalem Post (02/05, Starr) reported that a U.S. court has convicted the founder of a neo-Nazi group who planned to destroy the Baltimore power grid in an attempt to accelerat

ulloch), the Hill (02/05, Samuels), Politico (02/05, Gerstein, Orden), UPI (02/05, Hughes), Newsweek (02/05, Whisnant), Washington Examiner (02/05, Oliver), Bloomberg (02/05, Strohm), New York Post (02/05, Nelson), Washington Times (02/05, Howell), Daily Mail (02/05, Earle), CBS News (02/05, Rosen), Ep

stood (2) substance (1) standing (2) 565:21,25 629:12 497:9 621:5 588:11 497:13 551:14 567:14 572:21 states (8) stop (4) successful (1) Starr (3) 574:20 577:4,8 488:8,8 495:7 509:24 510:5 621:6 495:8,14 621:4 577:9,12,15,23 496:14 497:25 551:21 559:19 sue (1) start (4) 585:12 587:1

616:6,6 Office (18) older (1) object (25) 523:10,20,21 619:17 632:17 464:14 476:21 614:8 468:15 492:1,6 523:22 524:3,6 638:8 495:7 496:15 Oliver (1) 494:19 495:10 524:15 525:11 objections (8) 497:25 498:20 463:14 499:3 509:14 527:5,9,25 474:22 502:9,18 553:19 583:17 once (5) 545:20