Epstein Secrets

as counsel to the above noted entities to respond to the subpoenas dated April 24, 2007, served, respectively, on those entities. I understand from Gerald B. Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, both counsel to Jeffrey Epstein, that as a result of a telephone conversation had amongst you, Mr. Lefcourt and Ms. Sanchez,

d from Gerald B. Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, both counsel to Jeffrey Epstein, that as a result of a telephone conversation had amongst you, Mr. Lefcourt and Ms. Sanchez, you are now seeking documents reflecting: 1. Ownership of JEGE and Hyperion; 2. Assets of JEGE and Hyperion; and 3. Employees of

e statutory provision," not by outside objectives, such as those facilitating successful prosecution. See Cuellar, supra, Slip op. at 7. As Justice Alito stated in his concurring opinion, the government must prove not just the "effect" of the secretive transportation, but also that "petitioner knew th

See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter from I. to G. Lefcourt ("In other words, if the sex offense case is res

ving one of these effects was a design (i.e. purpose) of the transportation" of currency. Cuellar v. United States, supra, 553 U.S., Slip op. At I (Alito, J. concurring). Similarly, it is not enough that one effect of a communication scheduling a visit between Mr. Epstein and a minor was that there mi

y car was vane a dalized. It was like living in hell.” By this point, Epstein’s defense dream team included Jack 4 Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Gerald Lefcourt. All of them ; had excellent track records. Dershowitz and Lefcourt were tWO" 180 of America’s most famous celebrity lawyer— Ken Sta had had Bill C

tein’s defense dream team included Jack 4 Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Gerald Lefcourt. All of them ; had excellent track records. Dershowitz and Lefcourt were tWO" 180 of America’s most famous celebrity lawyer— Ken Sta had had Bill Clinton impeac team. As far as Mary’s parents walked into an ambush.

d & Ellis. And while Acosta had a sterling résumé, which included a stint leal that Krischer had offered to clerking for future Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito, he had Now the grand jury was recom- FF only argued two cases before a judge. zed with just one felony count of 4 At the time, Reiter did not know

ive statutory provision,” not by outside objectives, such as those facilitating successful prosecution. See Cuellar, supra, Slip op. at 7. As Justice Alito stated in his concurring opinion, the government must prove not just the “effect” of the secretive transportation, but also that “petitioner knew tha

3, August 16, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to G. Lefcourt (“In other words, if the sex offense case is reso