Epstein Secrets

Friday, December 21, 2007. +.341dph03.ec 3 EFTA01718569 JEFFREY EPSTEIN Timeline-Summary 2/20/2007--Meeting (US: and DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt). 6/26/2007--Meeting (US: !!!!!!!!!z, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). , DEF: Alan 7/26/2007--Meeting (US: (conference call), and

, Mr. Lewis, and a host of other highly skilled and experienced practitioners. The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt, whose experience speaks for itself. You and I spent hours negotiating the terms, including when to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When yo

as either entered a plea or been sentenced. We respectfully disagree with your view that you are required to notify the alleged victims pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004. First, 18 U.S.C. § 2255, the relevant statute under the Agreement for the settlement of civil remedies, does not have any connection to th

meeting between FAUSA S/0111810. Criminal Chief Menthol, West Paint Brach Chief Lonnie, AUSA Villafaiia, and two FBI agents who met with Roy Black, Gerald Lefeourt, and Lilly Ann Smeller., On that date, the prosecutors presented a written, four-bullet-point term sheet that would satisfy the federal interest in

As You put it, your group has a "combined 250 years experience" to my fourteen. The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt, whose experience speaks for itself. You and I spent hours negotiating the terms, including when to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When y

2007 DELIVERY BY BAND Miss Re: Dear Miss Several months ago, l provided you with a letter notifying you of your rights as a victim pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004 and other fedora] legislation, including: (1) (2) (3) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. The right to reasonable, em

akon Ave., Suite 400 * West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 . Facsimile: (561) 820-8777 August 16, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. Gerald P. Lefcourt, P.C. 148 Bast 78th Street New York, NY 10021 Re: Subpoena to Custodian of Records. ‘Dear Mr. Lefcourt: , < I write in response to your letter of

FACSIMILE Gerald Lefcourt, Esq. Gerald P. Lefcourt, P.C. 148 Bast 78th Street New York, NY 10021 Re: Subpoena to Custodian of Records. ‘Dear Mr. Lefcourt: , < I write in response to your letter of July 18, 2007 regarding the grand jury subpoena issued SF to the Custodian of Records for NES, LLC. Ihave

solution of Epstein Investigation Dear Miss : Several months ago, I provided you with a letter notifying you of your rights as a victim pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004 and other federal legislation, including: (1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. (2) The sight to reasonable, accurate,

Monday, September 10, 2007 5:23 PM To: Gerald Lefcourt Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAF

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 5:23 PM To: Gerald Lefcourt Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Gerry: As per your discussion with U.S. Attorney Acosta, I have attache

vernment to be the instigator of such lawsuits. Finally, we disagree with your view that you are required to notify the alleged victims pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004. First, 18 USC section 2255, the relevant statute under the Non-Prosecution Agreement for the settlement of civil remedies, does not have a

ing the federal investigation of Mr. Epstein. He asked to Tetttifith.her sir stated that she believed such a meeting would be In December, and Gerald Lefcourt again contacted AUSA to set a meeting. AUSA requested documents in advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contac

sted documents in advance of such a meeting, but the request was refused. Ms. Sanchez then contacted AUSA ME who agreed to meet with Mishez and Mr. Lefcourt. On February 1, 2007, Ms. Sanchez and Mr. Lefcourt met with AUSAs and a, as well as a member o f the Federal Bureau of Investigation, presented d

vernment to be the instigator of such lawsuits. Finally, we disagree with your view that you are required to notify the alleged victims pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004. First, 18 USC section 2255, the relevant statute under the Non-Prosecution Agreement for the settlement of civil remedies, does not have a

As you put it, your group has a "combined 250 years experience" to my fourteen. The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt, whose experience speaks for itself. You and I spent hours negotiating the terms, including when to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When y

esolution of Epstein Investigation Dear Miss Several months ago, I provided you with a letter notifying you of your rights as a victim pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004 and other federal legislation, including: (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. The right to reas

lex out of it at this venture. As for the Epstein camp, I'm not entirely sure because I don't think Lily was sure last time we spoke. Probably her, Lefcourt, Black and maybe Lewis. Lily told me that they wanted to present something in writing before the meeting which was why she was pushing us for the s

vernment to be the instigator of such lawsuits. Finally, we disagree with your view that you are required to notify the alleged victims pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004. First, 18 USC section 2255, the relevant statute under the Non-Prosecution Agreement for the settlement of civil remedies, does not have a

As You put it, your group has a "combined 250 years experience" to my fourteen. The agreement itself was signed by Mr. Epstein, Ms. Sanchez, and Mr. Lefcourt, whose experience speaks for itself. You and I spent hours negotiating the terms, including when to use "a" versus "the" and other minutiae. When y

Resolution of Epstein InveS.tigatt Dear Miss Several months ago, I provided you with a letter notifying you of your rights as a victim pursuant to the Justice for All Act «2004 and other federal legislation, including: (I) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused. (2) The right to reasonable, accurate,