Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00076068

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

d agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Dated: Dated: Dated: By: A. MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCM3Z, BSQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN Page 7 of 7 EFTA00076091 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document

ption in favor of detention based on the crimes charged, the presumption shifts only the burden of production, not persuasion. See United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756

EFTA00095871

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

MARIE VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY GERALD LEFCOURT, BSQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANC

EFTA00191587_sub_001 - EFTA00191587_100

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

ictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons,

rge number of uncharged overt acts, those uncharged acts can serve as a variance from/amendment to the Indictment. One of those cases was argued by Gerald Lefcourt — one of Epstein's attorneys. For those reasons, I have kept most of the overt acts from the original indictment (excluding those related to the Ja

hould consider those legislative findings among the other factors to be weighed in deciding whether a defendant should be detained. United States'. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986) (internal citations omitted) (discussing 'A grand jury indic nt provides the probable cause required by the sta