Epstein Secrets

rald Lefcourt provided written arguments for why Epstein should not be charged federal) Exhibit 32). The following day, Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly M presented their arguments to FAUSA and Chief Sil her supervisor, and I also attended (Exhibit 5). At some point during the meeting,

that, prior to this investigation, I had ever prepared' request for 6001 immunity, so I was researching the process. The meetingwith Ms. and Mr. Lefcourt was set for February 1, 2007. As noted above, despite Ms. statements of Epstein's willina to cooperate, she complained that my document requests w

ed to address the Court. I cited the CVRA and other statutes to support the Court's authority to hear from them. The second case was United States.. Oliver, which was the Office's first case seeking the appointment of I guardian ad litem (GAL). Through these cases, I researched statutes, cases, the USA

under attack from Ep- stein's lawyers and friends in New York, where he has a home. The New York Post quoted Epstein's prominent New York lawyer, Gerald Lefcourt, as saying his client was indicted only "because of the craziness of the police chief." Reiter has declined to comment on the case. Prosecutors

s lawyer in New York, Gerald Lefcourt, said, "The girl has admitted she is insane, but she can read a newspaper and recognize the word 'rich.'" Lefcourt also said the statute of limitations has expired for the woman's case criminally and civilly, and will almost certainly be r dismissed. He refu

i i by the time I joined it in 1977, people were still talking about the good old Gilmour days. EFTA01682757 _My close friend was his second son, Oliver, who is a conductor, who like his siblings was very close to his parents. In fact, the Gilmour family was a strange one. For England, that is. They

counsel for Epstein (Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt) prior to completing my investigation. My co-cou

will try to collect them into general categories in chronological order. a. I did not want to meet with counsel for Epstein (Lilly Ann Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt) prior to completing my investigation. My co-counsel (John McMillan) agreed with me. Our supervisor, Andrew Lourie, overruled us. b. AUSA McMillan

ked to address the Court. I cited the CVRA and other statutes to support the Court's authority to hear from them. The second case was United States' Oliver, which was the Office's first case seeking the appointment of a guardian ad litem (GAL). Through these cases, I researched statutes, cases, the USA

539:9 585:4 Lee (1) 610:5 leeway (1) 593:10 Lefcourt (7) 465:18 495:17 611:3 613:11 613:13 614:7 I

616:6,6 Office (18) older (1) object (25) 523:10,20,21 619:17 632:17 464:14 476:21 614:8 468:15 492:1,6 523:22 524:3,6 638:8 495:7 496:15 Oliver (1) 494:19 495:10 524:15 525:11 objections (8) 497:25 498:20 463:14 499:3 509:14 527:5,9,25 474:22 502:9,18 553:19 583:17 once (5) 545:20