Epstein Secrets

meeting with R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney, to further discuss this matter. Sincerely. Lilly Ann Sanchez cc. R. Alexander Acosta Gerald Lefcourt Roy Black FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. EFTA00310836 MAY 14, 2008 - FROM THE DEFENSE TO THE GOVT EFTA00310837 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Kenneth W. St

kends. EFTA00310824 LAW OF'ICCS OF GEFLALD B. LEFCOURT, P.G. ce o e rue tates Attorney Southern Dist

age 4 proceeds of specified unlawful activity,' or (c) 'to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under State or Federal law"'. United States v. Puche, 350 F.3d 1137 (11 Cir. 2003);5 see also United States v. Arditti, 955 F.2d 331 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, cert. denied 506 U.S. 998 (1992), cert. d

tein matter and the letter in response of Gerald Lefcourt and I would like to speak to you further regar in

one Number: (305) 789-9200 71200 - Epstein Please see attached correspondence from Roy BI e Jeffrey Epstein matter and the letter in response of Gerald Lefcourt and I would like to speak to you further regar ing same since we do not believe that Marie's letter es raised by Roy Black. I am in my office at

Int:our, P.G I proceeds of specified unlawful activity,' or ) 'to avoid araction reporting requirement under State orf ederal law"'. United States Puche, 350 3d 1137 (11" Cir. 2003);' see also United States I Arditti, 955'.2d 331 (5° Cir.), reh'g denied cert. denied 506 U.S. 998 (1992), cert. denie

LS) (USAFLS) Cc: . (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein Attachments: 2007-05-22 letter to AUSe Gentlemen, l a and I have already met with Lefcourt, which is really the meeting I promised him. I spoke to him last week and he said he had more information they wanted to present. I told him he coul

ssed with you, but with others if it is not resolved. Thanks for your attention. Could you email back so that I know you have received this letter? Gerald B. Lefcourt Gerald B I Afrat , P.C. Ne rk 10021 Tel. 1 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013303 EFTA00230208 cp/2.54 LekotAyf-to No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-

Page 4 proceeds of specified unlawful activity,' or (c) `to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under State or Federal law'. United States v. Puche, 350 F.3d 1137 (11th Cir. 2003);5 see also United States v. Arditti, 955 F.2d 331 (5'h Cir.), reh'g denied, cert. denied 506 U.S. 998 (1992), cert.

See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter from I. to G. Lefcourt ("In other words, if the sex offense case is res

t them in his house if they were under the age of 18. See United States v. Kennard, 472 F.3d 851, 857-858 (1 3'Cir. 2006), quoting, United States v Puche, 350 F.3d t 137, 1149 (11th Cir. 2003) (An instruction on deliberate ignorance is appropriate only if it is shown [among other things] ... that the

701^ STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORE 100E1 GERALD S. LEFCOuRT lefccuradercourtlaw.com SHERYL E. REICH INEVIM

Page 4 proceeds of specified unlawful activity,' orAc) `to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under State or Federal law". United States'. Puche, 350 F.3d 1137 (11th Cir. 2003);5 see also United States" Arditti, 955 F.2d 331 (5th Cir.), reh'g denied, cert denied 506 U.S. 998 (1992), cert. de

3, August 16, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to G. Lefcourt (“In other words, if the sex offense case is reso

et them in his house if they were under the age of 18. See United States v. Kennard, 472 F.3d 851, 857-858 (11" Cir. 2006), quoting, United States v. Puche, 350 F.3d 1137, 1149 (11™ Cir. 2003) (An instruction on deliberate ignorance is appropriate only if it is shown [among other things] . . . that the d