Epstein Secrets

as counsel to the above noted entities to respond to the subpoenas dated April 24, 2007, served, respectively, on those entities. I understand from Gerald B. Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, both counsel to Jeffrey Epstein, that as a result of a telephone conversation had amongst you, Mr. Lefcourt and Ms. Sanchez,

d from Gerald B. Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez, both counsel to Jeffrey Epstein, that as a result of a telephone conversation had amongst you, Mr. Lefcourt and Ms. Sanchez, you are now seeking documents reflecting: 1. Ownership of JEGE and Hyperion; 2. Assets of JEGE and Hyperion; and 3. Employees of

stein is prepared to plead guilty and accept a sentence for that offense—a sentence that, notably, is far more severe than that meted out to other "Johns" convicted of violating Florida's solicitation laws for cases in which sexual activity was alleged. Though CEOS points out its admirable goal of "p

FREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT 8 EFTA00176618 GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 9 EFTA00176619

understandings. Date: By: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Date: By: Date: By: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DEFENDANT 8 EFTA00176618 GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT 9 EFTA00176619 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs.

ireired-by-Seetion-3742-tooppeol-any-sentettee-ititposedritieloalingeny-restitution-ortiorror tounnealabeinannepin-wItiehalie-seittetwe-was-imposed, Johns the-semeneeeKeeedsahemtiannum permitted-by-suititterThe-defendam-funlieevoluntorityondoxpressly-waiveraaheanweimumement penttitted-by-fedenil-lal-t

tant prosecutor Dahlia Weiss and thereby influence the outcome of the State prosecution, that assertion is frivolous. Mr. Goldberger was retained by Gerald Lefcourt after Mr. Epstein already had been indicted by the Grand Jury. Mr. Lefcourt had never heard the name Dahlia Weiss when he hired Mr. Goldberger, and

tion, that assertion is frivolous. Mr. Goldberger was retained by Gerald Lefcourt after Mr. Epstein already had been indicted by the Grand Jury. Mr. Lefcourt had never heard the name Dahlia Weiss when he hired Mr. Goldberger, and had no idea that Mr. Goldberger's law partner was married to a sex-crimes p

"substantially enhanced" forms of punishment in order to vindicate federal interests, and given that the federal government does not itself require "Johns" to register as federal sex offenders, it is hard to see how State-law sex-offender registration can fairly be characterized as necessary to vindic

roup (a), and Bank of America (BAC). Epstein, who splits his time between Manhattan, Palm Beach, and St. Thomas, didn't return several phone calls. Gerald Lefcourt, one of the criminal defense lawyers helping Epstein fend off the solicitation charge, had no http://www.businessweek.com/print/bwdaily/dnflash/cont

not been served by the indictment. Reiter also referred the sae case to the FBI to whether any federal been violated. Manhattan attorney aid Lefcourt, one of E lawyers, declined to ment. "ORE\ 8 Sloane Curve, Palm Beach Fabulous direct oceanfront townhouse All maintenance included ,n Private s

red rehab. No prosecution. Jeffrey Epstein, fat cat, and frequent visitor to the Clinton soirees, got all caught up in a Palm Beach sting targeting Johns, who hired underage school girls for sex. The prosecutor in this Clintonesque sex scandal, Barry E. Krischer, obtained as many as five video-taped i

See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter from I. to G. Lefcourt ("In other words, if the sex offense case is res

gress, and administration policy statements intended in 18 U.S.C. § 1591 prosecutions. Evans, and his co-conspirators (Madison and Yeasty) were not "Johns." They operated a for profit prostitution ring marked by control of, and extreme violence toward, the victims, who they knew were underage. Indeed,

Epstein is prepared to plead guilty and accept a sentence for that offense—a sentence that, notably, is far more severe than that meted out to other “Johns” convicted of violating Florida’s solicitation laws for cases in which sexual activity was alleged. Though CEOS points out its admirable goal of “pr

3, August 16, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to G. Lefcourt (“In other words, if the sex offense case is reso