Epstein Secrets

e the list to the Federal Grand Jury investigation and thus to the non- disclosure provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). On July 8, 2008, you wrote to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., and informed him that on June 30, 2008, "the United States Attorney's Office provided [him] with a list of thirty-one individuals 'whom it wa

me in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein.'" (emphasis added). On July 9, 2008, you wrote in a follow-up letter to Mr. Goldberger that "the U.S. Attorney's modification of the 2255 portion of the Agreement now limits our victim list to those persons whom the United States was

the New York District Attorney. Sincerely, P. L- owitz, P.C. Cc: Martin G. Weinberg JPL/slm Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to September 3D, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit. Sne Bonner v. City of Prichard, Ala„ 661 F.2d 1206, 1207

rs tie the list to the Federal Grand Jury investigation and thus to the non-disclosure provisions of F.R.Crim.P 6(e). On July 8, 2008, you wrote to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., and informed him that on June 30, 2008, "the United States Attorney's Office provided [him] with a list of thirty-one individuals `whom it wa

ame in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein.'" (emphasis added). On July 9, 2008, you wrote in a follow-up letter to Mr. Goldberger that "the U.S. Attorney's modification of the 2255 portion of the Agreement now limits our victim list to those persons whom the United States was

the New York District Attorney. Sincerely, Jay P. Lefkowitz, P.C. Martin G. Weinberg JPL/kla Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to September 30, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit. See Bonner v. City of Prichard. Ala. 661 F.2d 1206, 1207

s was prepared to name as a victim of an enumerated offense. • ; Should your client decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, asks that you contact him at Atterbury Goldberger and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, (561) 659-8300. P

laim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, asks that you contact him at Atterbury Goldberge

of a public court proceeding or the right to restitution. In her memorandum, petitioner relies upon In Re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Or. 2008), where the Fifth Circuit held that the CVRA required the government to "confer in some reasonable way with the victims before ultimately exercising its broad discretion." a

e the list to the Federal Grand Jury investigation and thus to the non- disclosure provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). On July 8, 2008, you wrote to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., and informed him that on June 30, 2008, "the United States Attorney's Office provided [him] with a list of thirty-one individuals 'whom it wa

ry, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: Pursuant to the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida hereby provides y

New York District Attorney. Sincerely, P. Le owitz, P.C. Cc: Martin G. Weinberg JPL/slm I Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to September 30, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit, Sag Bonner v. City of Prichard, Ala., 661 F.2d 1206, 1207

ein's defense team, including yourself, Professor Dershowitz, former United States Attorney Guy Lewis, Ms. Lilly Ann Sanchez and Messrs. Roy Black, Jack Goldberger, Gerry Lefcourt and Jay Lefkowitz had the opportunity to review and raise objections to the terms of the Agreement. Again, no one raised objections

letters. You continue to refer to tho plea and sentencing es though it will be in January; Mr. Keleher's office has not confirmed any dale; and Mr. Goldberger recently told Marie Vlllafbfia that "there is no date." I must reiterate that a delayed guilty plea and sentencing — now more than two months beyon

(5th Cir. 2010) (Fifth Amendment rights of organization were violated when its name was listed among 246 unindicted coconspirators 'This opinion of the Fifth Circuit was made binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit pursuant to Bonner'. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en bane). 8 EFTA00

e the list to the Federal Grand Jury investigation and thus to the non- disclosure provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). On July 8, 2008, you wrote to Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., and informed him that on June 30, 2008, "the United States Attorney's Office provided [him] with a list of thirty-one individuals 'whom it wa

ry, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: Pursuant to the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida hereby provides y

the New York District Attorney. Sincerely, P. Le owitz, P.C. Cc: Martin G. Weinberg JPL/slm Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to September 30, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit. Den Donner v. City of Prichard. Ala. 661 F.2d 1206, 1207

t. A-8, page 39, lines 22-23. 9 EFTA00233740 counsel that any sidebar conversation would be on the record, the following exchange occurred: MR. GOLDBERGER [petitioner's counsel]: The reason why I asked to come sidebar is there is a nonprosecution agreement with the United States Attorney's office that

Notary Public, State of Florida West Palm Beach Office *100578 EFTA00233768 Proceedings June 10, 2009 APPEARANCES: On behalf of the Defendant JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE Atterbury, Goldberger, et al. On behalf of the Defendant ROBERT CRITTON, JR., ESQUIRE Burman, rr4tfnn or al. 1 1 1 1 14 15 1

of a public court proceeding or the right to restitution. In her memorandum, petitioner relics upon In Re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), where the Fifth Circuit held that the CVRA required the government to "confer in some reasonable way with the victims before ultimately exercising its broad discretion." Id

IN A STATE COURT HEARING AT WHICH NO VICTIMS ARE PRESENT On June 30, 2008, Epstein appeared in state court in West Palm Beach, with his attorney Jack Goldberger, and pled guilty to an information charging him with procuring a person under 18 for prostitution, as well as the indictment charging him with felon

63 Both Villafaña and the FBI case agent were present in the courtroom gallery to observe the plea hearing. Later that day, Villafaña met with Goldberger and gave him the list of 31 individuals the government was prepared to name as victims and to whom the § 2255 provision applied. In her 2015 CV

was intended to be broad,” as well as being a “mechanism[]” to ensure that victims were treated with fairness. In denying the victims relief, the Fifth Circuit nevertheless concluded that the district court “failed to accord the victims the rights conferred by the CVRA.”346 In particular, the Fifth Circuit

ony last year. 15 Eventually they show up with lawyers, a Bruce Reinhart I think 16 is an Epstein lawyer; I think at some point Ms. had 17 Mr. Goldberger, who's an attorney for Mr. Epstein now. They've 18 both made significant efforts to evade service. Why? Because 19 in our view the conspiracy con

d. That's a Fifth Circuit case from 1995, in which a 14 bank officer was accused of dishonest and fraudulent acts and 15 kind of bogus loans, and the Fifth Circuit allowed Fifth 16 Amendment invocations from the loan recipients to be used 17 against him, reasoning that, well, in this kind of a case, the 18

that they were evading service events. familiar with that from while we were trying to obtain Eventually they show up is an Epstein lawyer; I Mr. Goldberger, with lawyers, a think at some point who's an attorney for Mr. their testimony last year. Bruce Reinhart I think Ms. Marcinkova had Epstein now

of Maryland. That's a Fifth Circuit case from 1995, in which a bank officer was accused of dishonest and fraudulent acts and kind of bogus loans, and the Fifth Circuit allowed, Fifth Amendment invocations from the loan recipients to be used against him, reasoning that, well, in this kind of a case, the collusion t