Epstein Secrets

303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 842-2820 Fax: (561) 844-6929 [email protected] [email protected] Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 863-9100 Fax: (561) 835-86

[email protected] [email protected] Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 25

motion to limit the examination to 6 hours, Defendant’s citation to Lahr v. Fullbright & Jaworski, LLP , 164 F.R.D. 196, 202-204 (N.D. Texas 1995), Morton v. Haskell Co., No. 94-976-Civ-J-20, 1995 WL 819182 (N.D. Fla. September 12, 1995) and Mann v. Newport Tankers Corp., 96 F.R.D. 31 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)

ed. In Lahr, the court declined to limit a three hour clinical intake and evaluation by the defendant’s psychologist. Lahr, 164 F.R.D. at 201. In Morton, the court declined to limit a defense psychologist’s evaluation to one hour and declined to limit the evaluation to cover only one specific year,

ard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ahorowitzehermanlaw.com Iriveraahermanlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jaqeso

in the plea agreement with SA's See Exhibit "B" Goldberger Affidavit - EPSTEIN's criminal counsel. These al

re silly, unfounded and alleged violations which are not defined as violations under the NPA but arrived at by the USAO. Thus, EPSTEIN is left with "Morton's Fork" in his side - the undesirable choice of taking the 5th Amendment and having a judgment (summary or otherwise) entered against him in the ci

hian & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Service List in the manner specified by Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Eps

in the plea agreement with SA's See Exhibit "B" Goldberger Affidavit - EPSTEIN's criminal counsel. These al

re silly, unfounded and alleged violations which are not defined as violations under the NPA but arrived at by the USAO. Thus, EPSTEIN is left with "Morton's Fork" in his side - the undesirable choice of taking the 5h Amendment and having a judgment (summary or otherwise) entered against him in the civ

Acosta, DEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay Lefkowitz, Lilly Sanchez). EFTA01718570 9/12/2007--Meeting (US: and , DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourt and Jack Goldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA: Barry Krisher and Lanna Belohlavek). 9/18/2007--Rescheduled date for computer hearing.(Hearing initially set for 9/13/2007). 9

7. cc: The Honorable Sandra McSorley AITEREDRY, GOLDBERGER eb WEISS, P.A. Beech, Flori 33401 JA A LDBER

zen Eleventh Circuit cases involving prosecutions under § 2422(b), most of which involve this prototypical fact pattern. See, e.g„ United States v. Morton. 364 F3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2004), vacated for further consideration in light stf Booker, 125 S. Ct. 1338 (2006), opinion reinstated by, 144 Fed. Appx.

e copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this 25th day of March, 2009. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger Stuart S. Mermelstein Es• Atterbu Goldberger & Weiss P.A. Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2 ounse or 'e en ant Je rey o- Epstein 14 EFTA000673

in the plea agreement with SA's See Exhibit "B" Goldberger Affidavit - EPSTEIN's criminal counsel. These al

re silly, unfounded and alleged violations which are not defined as violations under the NPA but arrived at by the USAO. Thus, EPSTEIN is left with "Morton's Fork" in his side - the undesirable choice of taking the 5th Amendment and having a judgment (summary or otherwise) entered against him in the ci

ated Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Au

court restrict same in time or scope. Lahr v. Fullbright & Jaworski, LLP., 164 F.R.D 196, 202-204 (N.D. Texas 1995)(refusing to limit examination); Morton v. Haskell Co., No. 94-976-CIV-J-20, 1995 WL 819182, at *3 (N.D.Fla. Sept.12, 1995) (declining to limit duration of examination); See also Affidavi

were already pending against lender in bankruptcy adversary proceeding. Fed. Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 23(bX3), 28 U.S.C.A. ARGUED: Daniel P. Shapiro, Goldberg, Kohn, Bell, Black, Rosenbloom & Moritz, Ltd, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. Gil- bert Scott Bagnell, Bagnell & Eason, L.L.C., Columbia, South

7 S.Ct 2434, 2440, 58 L.Ed.2d 383 (1977) (Hunt k Simon, 426 U.S. at 40, 96 S.Ct. at 1925; Worth, 422 U.S. at 611, 96 S.Ct at 2211; Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 739, 92 S.Ct. 1361, 1868, 81 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972) (Sierra Club). In Hunt, the Supreme Court established a three-part test to determin