Epstein Secrets

t of Justice United Stales Attorney Southern District of Florida A. Marie 500 S. Australian Ave 4th Floor Facsimile FACSIMILE COVER SHEET TO: Jack Alan Goldberger DATE: July 8. 2008 FAX NO. PHONE NO. _ # OF PAGES: 3 RE: Jeffrey Epstein FROM: A. VILLAFASIA. Assistant U.S. Attorney PHONE NO. COMMENTS:

ry, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 25b Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: In accordance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, on June 30, 2008, the United States Attorney's Office provided you with a list of t

ctim decides 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000512 EFTA00184957 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-31 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 3 JACK POLDEERGER, ESQ. Jui.v 8,2008 PAGE 2 to pursue damages. If the United States learns that a civil suit has been filed against Mr. Epstein and he has denied t

il to meet this requirement. 63. A good illustration of the inadequacies of the privilege log comes from the very first entry in the log, covering Box No. 1 (P-000001 through P-000039), some 39 pages of documents. DE Si. Yet the only description of these 39 pages is: "File folder entitled 'CORR RE GJ

og (DE 216-1), with rearcSsupplemental box No. 3 P-013284 . The entry here reads: "7/10/08 emails, between and and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger's letter re victim notification." The log then indicates that the Government is asserting attorney-client privilege, work product privilege, and del

hone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by from Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science Foundation, Jack Goldberger, Alan Dersowitz, Roy Black, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, and any other person involved with the criminal defense of Jeffrey Epstein, including telep

il to meet this requirement. 63. A good illustration of the inadequacies of the privilege log comes from the very first entry in the log, covering Box No. 1 (P-000001 through P-000039), some 39 pages of documents. DE 212-1. Yet the only description of these 39 pages is: "File folder entitled 'CORR RE G

og (DE 216-1), with re ard to supplemental box No. 3 P-013284 . The entry here reads: "7/10/08 emails betwee' an and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger's letter re victim notification." The log then indicates that the Government is asserting attorney-client privilege, work product privilege, and del

hone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by from Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science Foundation, Jack Goldberger, Alan Dersowitz, Roy Black, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, and any other person involved with the criminal defense of Jeffrey Epstein, including telep

il to meet this requirement. 63. A good illustration of the inadequacies of the privilege log comes from the very first entry in the log, covering Box No. 1 (P-000001 through P-000039), some 39 pages of documents. DE 212-1. Yet the only description of these 39 pages is: "File folder entitled 'CORR RE G

box No. 3 (P-013284). The entry here reads: "7/10/08 emails between J. Sloman and A. Marie Villafafia, K. Atkinson, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger's letter re victim notification." The log then indicates that the Government is asserting attorney-client privilege, work product privilege, and del

s (including telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by Reinhart from Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science Foundation, Jack Goldberger, Alan Dersowitz, Roy Black, Ken Starr, Lillian Sanchez, and any other person involved with the criminal defense of Jeffrey Epstein, including telep

il to meet this requirement. 63. A good illustration of the inadequacies of the privilege log comes from the very first entry in the log, covering Box No. 1 (P-000001 through P-000039), some 39 pages of documents. DE 212-1. Yet the only description of these 39 pages is: "File folder entitled 'CORR RE G

to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson re "Jeffrey Epstein Agreement" discussing 6/24/08 email from A. Marie Villafafia to R. Black and J. Goldberger concerning the binding nature of the Agreement Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Deliberative Process No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary

en notes." 64. Another good illustration of the inadequacies of the privilege log is provided on page 20 of the first privilege log, with regard to Box No. 3 (P-012362 through P-012451). The Government asserts privilege here regarding 90 pages of documents. Yet the only description of these 90 pages is

aiapplemelliox No. 3 (P-013284). The entry here reads: "7/10/08 emails between J. and A. Villafafla, K. Atkinson, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger's letter re victim notification." The log then indicates that the Government is asserting attorney-client privilege, work product privilege, and del

il to meet this requirement. 63. A good illustration of the inadequacies of the privilege log comes from the very first entry in the log, covering Box No. 1 (P-000001 through P-000039), some 39 pages of documents. DE M-1. Yet the only description of these 39 pages is: "File folder entitled 'CORR RE GJ