Epstein Secrets

ffice, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.48 (Order Granting Moti

rom Florida Department of Corrections, dated Jul. 21, 2010); A.50 (Letter from Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.48 (Order Granting Motion for Travel, dated Dec. 18, 2009); A.53 (Letter from M. Weinberg, dated Aug. 16, 2010, at 4). Ap

thorities and was designated at the lowest level under that state's sex offender registration act. See A.88:6-15 (Tr.); see also A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); Fla. Stat. §§ 775.21, 943.0435. Appellant also registered in his home jurisdiction of the U.S. Virgin Islands (where Appella

ommentary (2006) 22, 31, 41 vi EFTA00792349 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration A

ffice, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.48 (Order Granting Moti

from Florida Department of Corrections, dated Jul. 21, 2010); A.50 (Letter from Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.48 (Order Granting Motion for Travel, dated Dec. 18, 2009); A.53 (Letter from M. Weinberg, dated Aug. 16, 2010, at 4). Ap

thorities and was designated at the lowest level under that state's sex offender registration act. See A.88:6-15 (Tr.); see also A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); Fla. Stat. §§ 775.21, 943.0435. Appellant also registered in his home jurisdiction of the U.S. Virgin Islands (where Appella

) 22, 31, 41 vi EFTA00181035 EFTA00181036 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration A

uthorities and was designated at the lowest level under that state's sex offender registration act. See A.88:6-15 (Tr.); see also A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); Fla. Stat. §§ 775.21, 943.0435. Appellant also registered in his home jurisdiction of the U.S. Virgin Islands (where Appella

e. Deputy 3228 Gum Club Road • West Patin Beach, Florida 33406-3001 • • http://vesettpbso.org - - WM014 donne* EFTA00231496 A51 Letter from Jack A. Goldberger to NYS Sex Offender Registry Regarding Florida Registration Level applicable to Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated August 12, 2010 A51-A52 ACTERBURY GO i D

from Florida Department of Corrections, dated Jul. 21, 2010); A.50 (Letter from Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.48 (Order Granting Motion for Travel, dated Dec. 18, 2009); A.53 (Letter from M. Weinberg, dated Aug. 16, 2010, at 4). Ap

ommentary (2006) 22, 31, 41 vi EFTA00231547 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration A

A51 Letter from Jack A. Goldberger to NYS Sex Offender Registry Regarding Florida Registration Level applicable to Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated August 12, 2010 A51-A52 ACTERBURY GOLDBE

from Florida Department of Corrections, dated Jul. 21, 2010); A.50 (Letter from Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); A.48 (Order Granting Motion for Travel, dated Dec. 18, 2009); A.53 (Letter from M. Weinberg, dated Aug. 16, 2010, at 4). Ap

authorities and was designated at the lowest level under that state's sex offender registration act. See A.88:6-15 (Tr); see also A.51 (Letter from J. Goldberger, dated Aug. 12, 2010); Fla. Stat. §§ 775.21, 943.0435. Appellant also registered in his home jurisdiction of the U.S. Virgin Islands (where Appella

ommentary (2006) 22, 31, 41 vi EFTA00232667 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Appellant Jeffrey E. Epstein seeks to vacate the final decision and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration A

the date of the complaints by the parents was May 22 or May 23, 2008. It was the week that Mr. Epstein had hired new counsel there which was a Mr. Jack Goldberger from West Palm Beach. And Mr. Goldberger was scheduled, according to the incident report, to meet with the representatives of the State SOUTHERN D

May 22 or May 23, 2008. It was the week that Mr. Epstein had hired new counsel there which was a Mr. Jack Goldberger from West Palm Beach. And Mr. Goldberger was scheduled, according to the incident report, to meet with the representatives of the State SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079790 1

d if I can go back in to try and answer your Honor's questions on registration. He has not reapplied challenging the New York Appellate Division or the New York Supreme Court decision. There was a legal dispute. Mr. Epstein's counsel at the time believed that the classification in New York should be restricted to the o

the date of the complaints by the parents was May 22 or May 23, 2008. It was the week that Mr. Epstein had hired new counsel there which was a Mr. Jack Goldberger from West Palm Beach. And Mr. Goldberger was scheduled, according to the incident report, to meet with the representatives of the State SOUTHERN D

May 22 or May 23, 2008. It was the week that Mr. Epstein had hired new counsel there which was a Mr. Jack Goldberger from West Palm Beach. And Mr. Goldberger was scheduled, according to the incident report, to meet with the representatives of the State SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00095432 1

d if I can go back in to try and answer your Honor's questions on registration. He has not reapplied challenging the New York Appellate Division or the New York Supreme Court decision. There was a legal dispute. Mr. Epstein's counsel at the time believed that the classification in New York should be restricted to the o