Epstein Secrets

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 2 (USAFLS) From: Jock Goldberger [email protected] Sent: -Irid il 1 1_701111 1 le, pm To: (USAFLS) Subject otice of thsclosure Please call me in regard to this lack go

USAFLS) Subject otice of thsclosure Please call me in regard to this lack goldberger From: (USAFLS) Sent: riday, July 11, 2008 12:01 PM To: Jack Goldberger Cc: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Nonce of Disclosure Dear Mr. Goldberger: Today, Dexter Lee and I appeared before Judge Ma

Sent: riday, July 11, 2008 12:01 PM To: Jack Goldberger Cc: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Nonce of Disclosure Dear Mr. Goldberger: Today, Dexter Lee and I appeared before Judge Marra in connection with a suit filed by wand asserting that their rights as victims were breached b

ficer. 1) SIGNATURE DATE SIONAT RE IOU U 4Ily. .r. RECEIVED BY REASON i r DATE/TIME RECEIVED • - •-__-, • . . ' :-:' ... • Y pi , . RFP WPB 00048.6 - • EFTA00185092 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-50 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 8 of 10 —a. Y. I r e n. ALT POPO Veen

re correct a t" containing 8/5/08 email from A. to A. Acosta, a re "Jeffrey Epstein Agreement" discussing 6/24/08 email from to R. Black and J. Goldberger concerning the binding nature of the Agreement Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Deliberative Process Suppl. Box #3 P-013290 Thru P-0132

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

t thru and regarding analysis of JeffiSstem agreement, with Deliberative Process P-015135 attached 6/24/2008 email from . I II to R. Black and J. Goldberger and attached Epstein agreement. (NB: Privilege is not being asserted for the two attachments. The 6/24/2008 email will be produced to petitioners'

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

efore June 30, 2008, the Office prepared a draft victim notification to be sent to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of th

to the victims—a letter that it intended to show to both Epstein and Jack Goldberger, as reflected by a place for the initials of both Epstein and Goldberger on the document. The notification was designed to inform the victims of the provisions of deferral of federal prosecution in favor of state charges

00076 (Exhibit II); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MR 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); REP WPB 000235-000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); REP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

wish farther clarification of our position or to discuss this matter in any way. Until then, I remain, • Very truly yours, Michael R. Thin cc; Jack Goldberger, Esq. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000547 ••• • •I•MPISIM EFTA00185097 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016

• Very truly yours, Michael R. Thin cc; Jack Goldberger, Esq. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000547 ••• •

n or to discuss this matter in any way. Until then, I remain, • Very truly yours, Michael R. Thin cc; Jack Goldberger, Esq. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000547 ••• • •I•MPISIM EFTA00185097 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-52 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 17 EXHIBIT 122 EFTA0

sentenced on October 26, 2007 is directly contradicted by Mr.. Simian's e-mail to me dated October $1 in which he states. "Your understanding from Jack Goldberger con:hems tomy understanding that Mr.. Epstein's plea and sentence will take place un the same day. I understand that the plea and sentence will occu

n which he states. "Your understanding from Jack Goldberger con:hems tomy understanding that Mr.. Epstein's p

in effect, nor did CEOS review the federal prosecutors' inappropriate Wens to implement those terms. We detail this point below. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001616 EFTA00184938 -`eat'iit FaCvNio %MAW. eauti;7nt 362-mriCigri iipirgy Docket 02/10/2016 Paij.Q34-3— hn IK.ON NON 13:22 FAX 1 213 8500 KIONI

ne Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Subpoenas to JEGE. Inc. and Hyperion Air. Inc. Dear Mr. Goldberger: It was a pleasure speaking with you today. As we discussed, the deadlines for complying with the subpoenas to JEGE, Inc. and Hyperion Air, Inc. ha

t of Florida to discontinue its involvement in this matter, and return responsibility for this case to the State of Florida. 17 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001686 EFTA00209865 Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Jay Lefkowitz [[email protected]] Sent: y, September 27, 2007 2:53 PM To: ,

Copies of the victim notifications will continue to be provided to counsel for Mr. Epstein. Please let me know whether I should continue to list Mr. Goldberger as the point of contact for the civil litigation. Regarding your suggestion on the content of the notification letters, I intend to use the same fo

l restitution aspects of the Agreement can be fulfilled. Sincerely. te 1.elkowuz cc: Karen Atkinson. Chief. Northern Division 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 000583 EFTA00185165 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 362-62 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 132 EFTA00185166 Case 9:08-c