Epstein Secrets

al regions are characterized by shared morphometric properties also in the normal brain: both are larger in the left than in the right hemisphere (Goldberg et al., 2013; Luders et al., 2006). The fact that these two structures are characterized by the same direc- tion of lateralization both in the heal

itive bias, functional cortical geometry, and the frontal lobes: Laterality, sex, and handedness. Journal of Cogni- sitr Neuroscience, 6, 274-294. ►Goldberg E., Ruediger, D., Kucukboyeci, N.E., Carlton, C., Devinsky, 0., Kuzniecky, R., I lalgren, E., Thew, T. (2013). Hemispheric asymmetries of cortical vol

Neurology and Neu- rosurgery, 112, 017-020. "'Murray, M.E., DcJcsus-Hernandez, M., Rutherford, N.J., Baker, M., Duara, R., Csraff-Radford, N., ... Dickson, D.W. (2011). Clinical and neuropathological heterogeneity of c9FIDALS associated with hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72. Acm Neuropadrol

portions of the correspondence written by government attorneys — all of the writings of Mr. Epstein's attorneys, except for a few short portions by Jack Goldberger — have been redacted"). 10 EFTA00583789 address Mr. Epstein's arguments regarding the recognition of a privilege under Fed. R. Civ. P. 501. As

ttorneys, except for a few short portions by Jack Goldberger — have been redacted"). 10 EFTA00583789 addr

son who asserts a privilege is a non-litigant," "an appeal from a final judgment [will] be inadequate." 4 EFTA00583783 In Holt-Ousted v. City of Dickson, 641 F.3d 230 (6th Cir. 2011), the plaintiffs sought to take an interlocutory appeal from an order compelling the testimony of their former attorney

rrespondence written by 3 EFTA00584605 government attorneys — all of the writings of Mr. Epstein's attorneys, except for a few short portions by Jack Goldberger — have been redacted"). Once the CVRA action was re-activated — after plaintiffs had successfully pursued their civil monetary remedies against Mr.

torneys, except for a few short portions by Jack Goldberger — have been redacted"). Once the CVRA action was

hat "when the person who asserts a privilege is a non-litigant," "an appeal from a final judgment [will] be inadequate." In Holt-Orsted v. City of Dickson, 641 F.3d 230 (6th Cir. 2011), the plaintiffs sought to take an interlocutory appeal from an order compelling the testimony of their former attorne