Epstein Secrets

are catalogued on the meeting timeline (Exhibit 5). I believe there was one other meeting soon after Epstein entered his guilty plea, when I went to Jack Goldberger's office and met with him and Mike Tein (Guy Lewis' law partner) about the victim list. Other than that, I do not recall any in-person meetings. I ha

away. Individual #28 contacted Epstein when she received the letter and subpoena; Epstein put her in touch with his attorney, Jack Goldberger; and Goldberger had his friend, Jim Eisenberg, serve as Individual #28's lawyer while Epstein paid Eisenberg's fees. Individual #28 later told Brad Edwards that som

id that he had been threatened with being sued if he didn't allow Epstein to participate (id.) I reviewed my emails and notes of conversations with Black, Goldberger, and other defense counsel about Epstein being incarcerated for the full 18 months (except for credit for "gain time"). Criminal Chief advised me t

o let us know if Epstein did, in fact, apply for work release. We never received any notice ofas application. Instead, on November 20, 2008, when Gauger stopped by to see on another matter he told her that Epstein had been on work release for the past few weeks (Exhibit 82). Sil spoke with the work

ards' clients, Individuals 35 and 43 (Exhibit B-66). Whenever I sent a victim notification letter, a redacted version of the letter also was sent to Jack Goldberger, counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. I was not authorized to send a victim notification letter to Individual # 28 or to include her on the list of persons

the document (id.). After conferring with an AUSA who had previously worked at the Palm Beach County SAO, and with FAUSA Sloman, I informed Messrs. Goldberger and Black that the agreement was insufficient because it did not specify that the defendant was supposed to serve his sentence in a custodial settin

aid that he had been threatened with being sued if he didn't allow Epstein to participate (id) I reviewed my emails and notes of conversations with Black, Goldberger, and other defense counsel about Epstein being incarcerated for the MI 18 months (except for credit for "gain time"). Criminal Chief Senior advised

s know if Epstein did, in fact, apply for work release. We never received any notice of Epstein's application. Instead, on November 20, 2008, when Gauger stopped by to see Karen Atkinson on another matter, he told her that Epstein had been on work release for the past few weeks (Exhibit 82). S/A Kuyrk

the "office" of the Florida Science Foundation is Jack Goldberger's office suite, and neither the office building d

office" of the Florida Science Foundation is Jack Goldberger's office suite, and neither the office building d

ortance: Normal --- Original Message From: (USAFLS) To: Cc: (USAFLS); Sent: Thu Jul 03 11:58:51 2008 Subject: Epstein Agreement Dear Colonel Gauger: Thank you for taking the time to meet with us on Tuesday. As we discussed, I have attached the pertinent portion of Mr. Epstein's agreement with t

ttorney. His office coincidentally happened to be not only in the same building (and on same floor) as Epstein's lead criminal defense counsel, lack Goldberger, but it was actually located right next door to the Florida Science Foundation -- an Epstein-owned and -run company where Epstein spent his "work r

DEFENDANT: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. MICHAEL BURMAN, ESQ. 9 Burman Critton, etc. 515 North Flagler Street 10 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 11 JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. 12 Atterbury Goldberger Weiss 250 Australian Avenue South 13 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 14 As Amicas cuicmie: , ESQ. 15 Assistant U.S.

her restrain them from notifying the Sheriffs Office if Mr. Epstein was not abiding by the work release rules. As I previously mentioned to Colonel Gauger, the decision regarding work release is completely within the discretion of the Sheriff's Office. The purpose of this letter is simply to provide y

DEFENDANT: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. MICHAEL BURMAN, ESQ. 9 Burman Critton, etc. 515 North Flagler Street 10 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 11 JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. 12 Atterbury Goldberger 250 Australian Avenue South 13 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 14 As Amicas Cunie: , ESQ. 15 Assistant U.S. Attorn

51 Defense? MR. CRITTON: Your Honor, Robert Critton on behalf of Mr. Epstein, and my partner, Michael Burman. 4 THE COURT: Good morning. 5 MR. GOLDBERGER: Good morning, Your Honor. Jack 6 Goldberger on behalf of Mr. Epstein. 7 THE COURT: I see we have some representatives from 8 the United States A

er restrain them from notifying the Sheriff's Office if Mr. Epstein was not abiding by the work release rules. As I previously mentioned to Colonel Gauger, the decision regarding work release is completely within the discretion of the Sheriff's Office. The purpose of this letter is simply to provide y

lty of perjury by Richard Kahn lists Mr. Kahn's and the Foundation's telephone number as "561-659-8300." That is the telephone number of Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss—one of the law firms representing Mr. Epstein. Richard Kahn is a partner at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell in New York and has no

er restrain them from notifying the Sheriff's Office if Mr. Epstein was not abiding by the work release rules. As I previously mentioned to Colonel Gauger, the decision regarding work release is completely within the discretion of the Sheriff's Office. The purpose of this letter is simply to provide y

d under penalty of perjury by Richard Kahn lists Mr. Kahn's and the Foundation's telephone number as ." That is the telephone number of Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss—one of the law firms representing Mr. Epstein. Richard Kahn is a partner at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell in New York and has no

er restrain them from notifying the Sheriff's Office if Mr. Epstein was not abiding by the work release rules. As I previously mentioned to Colonel Gauger, the decision regarding work release is completely within the discretion of the Sheriff's Office. The purpose of this letter is simply to provide y

lty of perjury by Richard Kahn lists Mr. Kahn's and the Foundation's telephone number as "561-659-8300." That is the telephone number of Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss—one of the law firms representing Mr. Epstein. Richard Kahn is a partner at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell in New York and has no

er restrain them from notifying the Sheriff's Office if Mr. Epstein was not abiding by the work release rules. As I previously mentioned to Colonel Gauger, the decision regarding work release is completely within the discretion of the Sheriff's Office. The purpose of this letter is simply to provide y

lty of perjury by Richard Kahn lists Mr. Kahn's and the Foundation's telephone number as "561-659-8300." That is the telephone number of Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss—one of the law firms representing Mr. Epstein. Richard Kahn is a partner at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell in New York and has no

er restrain them from notifying the Sheriff's Office if Mr. Epstein was not abiding by the work release rules. As I previously mentioned to Colonel Gauger, the decision regarding work release is completely within the discretion of the Sheriff's Office. The purpose of this letter is simply to provide y

lty of perjury by Richard Kahn lists Mr. Kahn's and the Foundation's telephone number as "561-659-8300." That is the telephone number of Atterbury, Goldberger and Weiss—one of the law firms representing Mr. Epstein. Richard Kahn is a partner at the law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell in New York and has no

retion, you may or may choose to consult with the appropriate judge on this matter. Request for Notification As I had previously asked of Colonel Gauger, I would appreciate if you would keep me informed of any changes to Mr. Epstein's release status so that I may fulfill my obligations to keep the v