Epstein Secrets

d on FLSD Docket 09/30/2009 Page 8 of 9 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Bradley James Edwards [email protected] Isidro Manuel

Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critt

mation by conceding that he in fact has the papers. Fisher v. United States In , 425 U.S. 391, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (1976), Fisher, the United States Internal Revenue Service subpoenaed the accounting records in the possession of several taxpayers’ attorneys. 425 U.S. at 391. The taxpayers were under investigation by t

ded Complaint Page 3 of 3 COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Bruce E. Rei

Correction to Plaintiffs Memorandum in Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Page 3 of 3 COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Bruce E. Reinhart, Esquire Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Robert Critton, Esquire West Pa

Dismiss, and states as follows: Plaintiff's Memorandum contains a typographical error on page four. The last sentence of the quote from Hammers v. Internal Revenue Service, 988 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1993) on the top of page four reads "We may not look beyond them when, taken as a whole, they are rational and ambiguous," w

RRAJJOHNSON Plaintiffs Memorandum in Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Page 18 of 18 COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 110110menISPOPPtimill. West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Bruce E. Reinhart, Esquire Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.

d Complaint Page 18 of 18 COUNSEL LIST Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 11

te federal criminal statutes. The underlying approach to statutory construction was succinctly set forth in the Fifth Circuit decision in Hammers v. Internal Revenue Service, 988 F.2d 32 (51h Cir. 1993): The sole purpose of statutory construction, including, when appropriate, a review of all available legislative histo

rom: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=00c09f9c9ad1c995c80489681424 Forwarded message From: Jack Goldberger < Date: Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:08 PM Subject: FW: Letter from Gary Farmer, Jr. To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> *From:* Beth Williamso

95c80489681424 Forwarded message From: Jack Goldberger < Date: Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:08 PM Subject: F

ntended or written to be used, and may not be used or relied upon, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS

Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 83

oulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250

M/ECF and EMAIL) Michael D. Seese, Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP 1 E Broward Blvd Ste 1010 Ft Lauderdale. Florida 33301 (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Internal Revenue Service Centralized Insolvency Operations Box 21126 Philadelphia, PA 19114 (Via U.S. Mail) Internal Revenue Service Special Procedures - Insolvency 78

te: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:54:31 +0000 Attachments: Goldberger letter.pdf Please see the attached letter. Jill

ntended or written to be used, and may not be used or relied upon, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. Disclaimer: This E-mail is covered by the

were already pending against lender in bankruptcy adversary proceeding. Fed. Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 23(bX3), 28 U.S.C.A. ARGUED: Daniel P. Shapiro, Goldberg, Kohn, Bell, Black, Rosenbloom & Moritz, Ltd, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. Gil- bert Scott Bagnell, Bagnell & Eason, L.L.C., Columbia, South

Appellee. No. 90-6034. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Oct. 22, 1991. Member of Church of Scientology filed complaint against Internal Revenue Service (IRS) seeking tax refunds on grounds that IRS inconsistently administered charitable deductions for quid pro quo payments to religious organizati