Epstein Secrets

V-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 23 SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hil

Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton

Do Not Require Independent Evidence Before An Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn Rather than analyze whether the inference satisfies the two-prong Custer Battles test, Epstein pulls another sentence out of context from the opinion, which he claims forms yet a third prong of what Custer Battles itself

21 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAJJOHNSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. k)Idberger aewpa.com Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton(&.bciclaw.com Isidro Manual Garcia isidrociarcia bellsouth.net Jack Patrick Hill i

ct Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. k)Idberger aewpa.com Robert D. Critton, E

se liberal discovery rules, and 'undermine[s] to some degree the trial system's capacity to ascertain the truth." United States ex rel. DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LLC, 415 F.Supp.2d 628, 632 (E.D. Va. 2006) (quoting Robert Heidt, The 8 EFTA00234878 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on

ct Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger Es . Robert D. Critton, Esq. s/ Adam D. Horowit

ether the Fifth Amendment privilege is validly asserted in response to particular questions. This issue is typically resolved on a motion to compel. Custer Battles 415 F. Supp. 2d at 633. If it is determined that the privilege is properly asserted, then adverse inferences are admissible consistent with