Epstein Secrets

ourt, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton

red on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 9 of 10 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Adam D. Horowitz 10 C

t “[a]lthough the present motion arises in the context of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp., 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 “is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions”).

ourt, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton

Docket 05/06/2009 Page 8 of 9 - - 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Adam D. Horowitz Case

d on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 4 of 9 - - 5 of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp., 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 “is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions”). A

District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critt

ourt, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critt

emain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp. 12. As the above-referenced case

3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 9 of 9 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Adam D. Horowitz -9- EFTA00222170

ct Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton,

ent 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 05'06/2009 Page 5 of 9 of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker ICmart Corp. 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 "is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions"). As t