Epstein Secrets

Docket 03/26/2009 Page 9 of 10 - 10 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein

ourt, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton

a desirable administrative technique and is within the power of the Court.” Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure, §2382 (2008). See also Newman v. Eagle Building Technologies, 209 F.R.C. 499, 501 (S.D. Fla. 2002) (noting that Court has broad discretion under Rule 42(a) to consolidate cases w

credibility. Both the state attorney and the grand jury concluded there was notsufficient evidence that Epstein had s_ex with minors, according to Goldberger.- "It was just a childish performance. by the Palm Beach Police Department," Golcll:>erger said. The defense attomey said one :of the alleged victim

en ~pornographic: ima:g·es .of y_Oll11g girls on Epstein's :computer,. according to court retards'. Neither Epstein's c;riminal defens.e attorney; Jack Goldb.erger, not attorney Rohert Critton, who repre·sents Epstein in the civil lawsuits, could be reached. Federal prQsecu_t9rs have consistently d:edinecl ~om

access to criminal proceedings, see, e.g., Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 573 (1980), including pre-trial criminal proceedings. Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796 (11th Cir. 1983). Indeed, “the integrity of the judicial process, which public scrutiny is supposed to safeguard, is just a

g to Epstein's attorney. "The embarrassment on the prosecutor's face was evident when the police officer never showed up for the meeting/' attorney Jack Goldberger said. Later in Aprili Recarey walked into a prosecutor's office at the state attorney's office and learned the case was taking an unexpected turn.

into the Palm Beach County Jail early July 23 and released hours later. Epstein's legal team "doesn't dispute that he had girls over for massages," Goldberger said. But he said their claims that they had sexual encounters with him lack credibility. "They are incapable of being believed," he said. "They ha

cess to criminal proceedings, see, e.g., Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 573 (1980), including pre-trial criminal proceedings. Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796 (11th Cir. 1983). Indeed, “the integrity of the NOT A CERTIFIED COPY 15 ACTIVE 696232185v3 judicial process, which p

Ft. Lauderdale FL 33301 Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Paul G. Cassell Email: PRO HAG ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED represented by Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-5012 Fax: 835-8691 Email: https://ecf.fls

(Critton, Robert) (Entered: 10/02/2008) 10/03/2008 13 r 513 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jack Alan Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein (Goldberger, Jack) (Entered: 10/03/2008) https://ed.flsd.uscourts.gov/egi-bin/DktRpt.pl?859999798355213-L_801_0-1 6/10t2009 EFTA00175418 CM/ECF • Live Datab

()nip:imam & Enfortenant of Judgment 0 IS) Medium Act 0 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loam (Fad. %tains) 0 IS) Recovery of Overpaymers of Newman's Aeneas O 160 Stockholden' Suits 0 190 Other Cotermi 0 195 Convect Product Liability 0 196 Franchise PERSONAL INJURY 0 310 Airplane 0 315 Mut

ein had spoken with Manhattan criminal attorney Gerald Lefcourt to review his options. Within days, Lefcourt brought in Palm Beach criminal attorney Jack Goldberger who just happened to know state attorney Krischer before he became a prosecutor. But not only was Goldberger friendly with the man prosecuting Epst

x-crimes investigator resigned from the case. Epstein's deal was abandoned and a new assistant prosecutor was assigned. Epstein was so thrilled by Goldbergees work that shortly after he was indicted on just a single prostitution charge, he bought the Palm Beach lawyer a black, top- of-the-line 500 series B

) Moore, Nancy (CC B) Morgan, Michael (CC Pr Moyer, Michelle (CC B) Nerona, Jocelyn (Volunt) Neto, Elizabeth (Felony) Nebo, Uriel (Exec) Newman, Arlene (INVEST) Nixon, Melissa (CC B) Nolan, Terry (DOVE Felony)Nolan, Tony (Belle Glade) Ojeda, Ada (CC P) Orozco, Eyder Ortiz, Carlos Pa

nd July invoices -50,000.00 549.75142 Check 8/4/2010 Scott Graf 7/30/2010-8/02/2010 invoices -3.600.00 546.15142 Check 8/4/2010 Atterbury. Goldberger 8. Wei... -2.000.00 544.15142 Check 8/4/2010 Black. Srebnick. Kcrnspan Account # 826.01 Statement ... -25,000.00 519,156.42 Check 8/4/2010 T

2010 Loranger Door and Window ... -28,097.85 699,315.50 Check 7/29/2010 American Express 3715-657... -30,590.25 668,725.25 Check 7/29/2010 Newman 8. Moil Concrete Co... Project 03-120 Mechanical B... -26,949.80 641,775.45 Check 7/29/2010 Blue Water Construction -9.400.00 632,375.45 Che

Debit Via: Grand Bk & Tr/067014466 NC: Atterbury Goldberger Richardsoref. 20,000.00 1,139,834.96 Bene. Att

16B1Ogc05C006595 Trn: 0620700197Es 07/16 Fedwire Debit Via: Nexity Fin Corp/062006330 NC: Merchants Commercial Bank Ben: 10,051.40 1,129,783.56 Newman And Moll Concrete Ref: Name: Newman And Moll Concrete Contractors Ref Project 03-120 Lsj Mechanical Building, Req No 9 Imad: 0716810gc04C003415 Tm:

Debit Via: Grand Bk & Tr/067014466 A/C: Atterbury Goldberger Richardsoref: Bene:Atterbury Goldberger Richards

oltimad: 0602B1Qgc01C003007 Trn: 0599700153Es Deposit 486691284 Fedwire Debit Via: Nexity Fin Corp/062006330 A/C: Merchants Commercial Bank Ben: Newman And Moll Concrete Contrref: Acct Name Newman And Moll Concrete Contractors Ref Project 03-120 Lsj Mechanical Building Req 7 Imad: 0604B1Qgc01C00548

Debit Via: Grand Bk & Tr/067014466 A/C: Atterbury Goldberger Richardsoref: Bene. Atterbury Goldberger Richard

ger Richardson & Weiss Imad: 0716B1Q9c05C006595 Trn: 0620700197Es Fedwire Debit Via: Nexity Fin Corp/062006330 A/C: Merchants Commercial Bank Ben: Newman And Moll Concrete Ref: Name: Newman And Moll Concrete Contractors Ref:Project 03-120 Lsj Mechanical Building, Req No 9 Imad: 0716B1Qgc04C003415 Trn:

to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Senior, K. Atkinson re "Jeffrey Epstein Agreement" discussing 6/24/08 email from A. Marie Villafafia to R. Black and J. Goldberger concerning the binding nature of the Agreement Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Deliberative Process No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary

ds, a type of restitution; "[c]riminal forfeiture is . . . separate from restitution, which serves an entirely different purpose." United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235, 1241 (9th Cir. 2011). Among other differences between restitution and forfeiture, only the criminal defendant is subject to restit