Epstein Secrets

IN A STATE COURT HEARING AT WHICH NO VICTIMS ARE PRESENT On June 30, 2008, Epstein appeared in state court in West Palm Beach, with his attorney Jack Goldberger, and pled guilty to an information charging him with procuring a person under 18 for prostitution, as well as the indictment charging him with felon

63 Both Villafaña and the FBI case agent were present in the courtroom gallery to observe the plea hearing. Later that day, Villafaña met with Goldberger and gave him the list of 31 individuals the government was prepared to name as victims and to whom the § 2255 provision applied. In her 2015 CV

heard at plea proceedings. The 2011 revision remedied this omission. 242 Department had made its “best efforts in thousands of federal and District of Columbia cases to assert, support, and defend crime victims’ rights.” The response also referenced OLC’s December 2010 opinion concluding that CVRA rights

08. IERBURY, GOLDBERGER, & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm each, Florida 33401 (56 659-• 00 / fa 561) 1 J C 7A. OLDBERGER, ESQUIRE ori a Bar No. 262013 07/26/17 Page 69 of 131 Public Records Request No.: 17-295 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,

and Michael R. Tein, Esquire, 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340, Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 by via fax & mail this 25' day of March, 2008. ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER, & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 We Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (5 ) 65 -8310 J A. GOLi BERGER, ESQUIRE Fl da Bar No. 26

1 Public Records Request No.: 17-295 MchaelSalnkk• Jack K. Fuchs Flynn R Bertisch • Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer • Member of Colorado, District of Columbia and New York Bars Jennifer L. Shand Certified Leval Assistant ONE CLEARLAKE CENTRE 250 SOUTH AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SUITE 1203 WEST PALM BEACH, FLO

were already pending against lender in bankruptcy adversary proceeding. Fed. Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 23(bX3), 28 U.S.C.A. ARGUED: Daniel P. Shapiro, Goldberg, Kohn, Bell, Black, Rosenbloom & Moritz, Ltd, Chicago, Illinois, for Appellant. Gil- bert Scott Bagnell, Bagnell & Eason, L.L.C., Columbia, South

f any criminal investigation related to past conduct as Senate aide and to immunize him from future prosecution. United States District Court for District of Columbia dismissed complaint, and plaintiff appealed. Holdings: The Court of Appeals held that: (1) plaintiff was not entitled to injunctive relief, and (