Epstein Secrets

Florida asks that you provide the following amended notice to your client, . Some of the information contained in the July 10, 2008 letter to Ms. Robson was inaccurate, so please advise her of the following changes. As you were previously advised, on June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter refer

e, or if Ms. Robson selects another attorney to represent her, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In le Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

entire agreement between the United States and Mr. Epstein. Mr. Josefsberg can provide further 87 EFTA00179907 guidance on this issue or, if Ms. Robson has selected another attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

disclosure of the entire agreement between the United States and Mr. Epstein. Mr. Joscfsberg can provide further guidance on this issue or, if Ms. Robson has selected another attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-C1V-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

disclosure of the entire agreement between the United States and Mr. Epstein. Mr. Josefsberg can provide further guidance on this issue or, if Ms. Robson has selected another attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

Florida asks that you provide the following amended notice to your client, HIOR Some of the information contained in the July 10, 2008 letter to Ms. Robson was inaccurate, so please advise her of the following changes. As you were previously advised, on June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter refe

his issue, or if you select another attorney to represent you, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder

Florida asks that you provide the following amended notice to your client, HIOR Some of the information contained in the July 10, 2008 letter to Ms. Robson was inaccurate, so please advise her of the following changes. As you were previously advised, on June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter refe

his issue, or if you select another attorney to represent you, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA. As I stated in my earlier notification, please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Feder