Epstein Secrets

may be entitled to discovery of relevant evidence that is in the present possession of the grand jury or other law-enforcement agencies. See, e.g., Simpson v. Hines, 729 F. Supp. 526, 527 (E.D. Tex. 1989) ("The grand jury has concluded its deliberations .... The need for secrecy of these specific tapes

on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 8 of 13 pending before this Court, are literally lifted4 from the plaintiffs' brief submitted to, and rejected by, the Northern District of New York in Francis.) The court specifically held that "because the victims were minors at the time of the Defendants' actions alleged in both [the civil and

that the crime be Iserved as U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida em an interstate nexus. Secoi e . : |

rs on s von Bulow, the Brit- ish socialite who Dershowitz had been football star was acquitted of Brown Simpson and Nicole’s friend Ron n Balow and Simpson had been, ne rich as vo t Epstein was willing and able to deplo the resources tha y in his own defense. Neither of them had been intim: As far as

s sexual trafficking victims in a case pending in the Southern District of Florida, specifically case no. 08-cv-80736- KA

_OVERSIGHT_015612 --- PAGE BREAK --- EXHIBIT B HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015613 --- PAGE BREAK --- From: Susan Moss To: Thomas E. Scott; Steven R. Safra; Simpson, Richard; Borja, Mary; Eiler, Ashley; Jack Scarola; Mary E. Pirrotta; [email protected] Subject: Edward & Cassell v. Dershowitz CACE 15-000072 (0