Epstein Secrets

ing. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://www.nij.gov/journals/279/Pages/next-generation-of-crime-tools-and-challenges- 3d-printing.aspx. 4. Weiss, D. and LaPorte, G. Uncertainty Ahead: A Shift in How Federal Experts Can Testify. NIJ Journal No. 279, September 2017: https://www.nij.gov/journal

ensic- scientists-through-sciencetechnology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-2157-7145- 1000384.pdf 9. Gresham, K., LaPorte, G.., Montgomery, B. and Weiss, D. Using Innovative Technology to Investigate Targeted Mass Violence: What the Future Holds (May 2017) http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/using-in

estern District of Michigan Case No. 1:08-CR-68 Grand Rapids, MI March 10, 2011 32. Yakov Shlimovich v. Mikhail Cheban, et al Case No. BC408095 Superior Court of the State of California Los Angeles, CA March 25, 2011 33. USA v. Rami Saba U.S. Western District of Michigan Case No. 1:08-CR-68 Grand Rapi

overns ex parte communications. In this case, Rule 2.9(B) applies, since the communication was unauthorized and bore upon the substance of Attorney Weiss's Motion to Withdraw. The Rule requires that the Court notify the parties upon receipt of such a communication and disclose the substance. Complying

Vice President, J.P. Molyneux Studio, Ltd., at 750 Lexington Avenue, Fifth Floor, New York, NY 10022. DATED: December L2012 OLL III Judge of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands ATT ETIA H. VEL UEZ, ESQUIRE LORI B -TYSO /9/ /O2 Court C fit Supervisor 1O2--/ EFTA00613771

uld your client decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, asks that you contact him at Atterbury Goldberger and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, (561) 659-8300. Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor

ray of mandatory closure rules ... proves too much, and runs contrary to the very foundation of the right of access...." Globe Newspa- per Company" Superior Court, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 2622 (1982). Accordingly, having considered the briefs and argu- ments of counsel for the reasons set forth in this opinion, it i

ay 8:23 9:9 10:5,16 10:19 11:4 13:16 14:10 19:23 25:1 25:18 27:3,4 28:22 28:23 ways 30:18 wealthy 32:13 weigh 26:11 Weinberg 2:17 4:16 4:16 Weiss 2:12 wel17:10 8:20 10:22 11:12,12,13,13 12:17 13:16 14:11 15:7 16:18 17:15 17:23 18:10,11 33:24 35:12,19,20 36:5 39:4 40:13 went 6:18,22 26:2

ray of mandatory closure rules ... proves too much, and runs contrary to the very foundation of the right of access...." Globe Newspa- per Company Superior Court, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 2622 (1982). Accordingly, having considered the briefs and argu- ments of counsel for the reasons set forth in this opinion, it i