Epstein Secrets

iv. P. 53(e), and other applicable Federal Rules and Local Rules. In support, Epstein states: I. This court entered an order (DE 555) stating that Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez")(DE 469), must produce, to the extent in his possession, " ... any and all journal, notes, diaries, and writings relating to Jeffrey E

he extent in his possession, " ... any and all journal, notes, diaries, and writings relating to Jeffrey Epstein including the journal described by Rodriguez to Palm Beach Police that [allegedly] contains the names of girls who visited the residence." (DE 555, p.2) 2. As set forth m Rodriguez's depositi

ee infra. Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of 4 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 559

ctive Order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). In support, Epstein states: Procedural Background 1. This court entered an order (DE 555) stating that Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez")(DE 469), must produce, to the extent in his possession, " ... any and all journal, notes, diaries, and writings relating to Jeffrey E

ing to Jeffrey Epstein including the journal described by Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 560 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2010 Page 2 of 11 Rodriguez to Palm Beach Police that [allegedly) contains the names of girls who visited the residence." (the "journal" or "book") (DE 555, p.2) 2. On June 4

Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials 2 Because of the relief sought in this Rule 4 Appeal, Epstein's civil lawyers have not obtained a cop

ctive Order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). In support, Epstein states: Procedural Background 1. This court entered an order (DE 555) stating that Alfredo Rodriguez ("Rodriguez")(DE 469), must produce, to the extent in his possession, "...any and all journal, notes, diaries, and writings relating to Jeffrey Eps

her third parties or attach any portion of same to any pleadings pending the outcome of the Rule 4 Appeal. att infra A roument 3. As set forth in Rodriguez's deposition, he was an employee of Epstein. Rodriguez Deposition, Exhibit "A" at p. 12-13. Moreover, as an individual employee, Rodriguez claims

Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing par