Epstein Secrets

or “we will consider it a breach ofthe agreement and proceed accordingly.” Villafafia further advised her superior: “Someone really needs to talk to Barry [Krischer].” Appendix at 3 (OPR Report, p. 109). I ! Greenberg Traurlg, PA ■401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 2000 ■Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 ■Tel 954:765

4:10:49 PM 11. On May 1, 2006, Town of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter wrote a “personal and confidential” letter to former State Attorney Krischer, stating: I must renew my prior observation to you that I continue to find your office’s treatment of [the Epstein] cases highly unusual. It is regre

gs because of the exceptional public interest in this case and the compelling circumstances supporting transparency rather than continued secrecy. 1. The Grand Jury is Under the Court’s Supervision and Jurisdiction. 92. It is well-settled that the grand jury is ‘“a judicial proceeding in a court of justice . . an

rney's Office. She explained that her boss, Barry Krischer, was requesting this case be taken to the Grand

uled to leave on the 10th at 5:00 pm. On May 12, 2006, I met with ASA Lana Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. She explained that her boss, Barry Krischer, was requesting this case be taken to the Grand Jury again. I explained to her I had requested arrest warrants for Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen,

6, I met with ASA Lana Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. She explained that her boss, Barry Krischer, was requesting this case be taken to the Grand Jury again. I explained to her I had requested arrest warrants for Jeffrey Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson. I asked that she either issue the wa

********************NARRATIVE # 41 ************************** Reported By: RECAREY, JOSEPH 4/10/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/10/06 A Grand Jury Session was requested during the month of February 2006, in which all the girls that had been interviewed would have been called to testify before

. However I expressed that was only my opinion and the final approval would come from the Chief of Police. She explained to have Chief Reiter call Barry Krisher about the deal. I left the area and returned to the police station where I briefed the Chief about the deal offered. I checked my voice mail messa

ellation. I advised Valentine that as this Grand Jury session was called based on the State Attorney's Office decision to have the victims heard by the Grand Jury that I felt it was the States Attorney's Office responsibility to contact the victims and advise them of the reason they were no longer needed. •

PIs is a private investigator intern who is licensed by the state. I informed the State Attorney's Office of the above information. I received the Grand Jury subpoenas for a Grand Jury session to be held on Apri 18, t roug Apri 20, 2006. Investigation continues. ****************************NARRATIvE #

PIs is a private investigator intern who is licensed by the state. I informed the State Attorney's Office of the above information. I received the Grand Jury subpoenas for a Grand Jury session to be held on Apri 18, t roug Apri 20, 2006. Investigation continues. ****************************NARRATIvE #

PIs is a private investigator intern who is licensed by the state. I informed the State Attorney's Office of the above information. I received the Grand Jury subpoenas for a Grand Jury session to be held on Apri 18, t roug Apri 20, 2006. Investigation continues. ****************************NARRATIvE #

PIs is a private investigator intern who is licensed by the state. I informed the State Attorney's Office of the above information. I received the Grand Jury subpoenas for a Grand Jury session to be held on Apri 18, t roug Apri 20, 2006. Investigation continues. ****************************NARRATIvE #

PIs is a private investigator intern who is licensed by the state. I informed the State Attorney's Office of the above information. I received the Grand Jury subpoenas for a Grand Jury session to be held on Apri 18, t roug Apri 20, 2006. Investigation continues. ****************************NARRATIvE #

ellation. I advised valentine that as this Grand Jury session was called based on the State Attorney's Office decision to have the victims heard by the Grand Jury that I felt it was the States Attorney's Office responsibility to contact the victims and advise them of the reason they were no longer needed. **

ellation. I advised valentine that as this Grand Jury session was called based on the State Attorney's Office decision to have the victims heard by the Grand Jury that I felt it was the States Attorney's Office responsibility to contact the victims and advise them of the reason they were no longer needed. **

ellation. I advised valentine that as this Grand Jury session was called based on the State Attorney's Office decision to have the victims heard by the Grand Jury that I felt it was the States Attorney's Office responsibility to contact the victims and advise them of the reason they were no longer needed. **

ellation. I advised valentine that as this Grand Jury session was called based on the State Attorney's Office decision to have the victims heard by the Grand Jury that I felt it was the States Attorney's Office responsibility to contact the victims and advise them of the reason they were no longer needed. **

ellation. I advised valentine that as this Grand Jury session was called based on the State Attorney's Office decision to have the victims heard by the Grand Jury that I felt it was the States Attorney's Office responsibility to contact the victims and advise them of the reason they were no longer needed. **

uled to leave on the 10th at 5:00 pm. On May 12, 2006, I met with ASA Lana Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. She explained that her boss, Barry Krischer, was requesting this case be taken to the Grand Jury again. I ex lained to her I had re ested arrest warrants for Jeffrey Epstein, and . I asked

uled to leave on the 10th at 5:00 pm. On May 12, 2006, I met with ASA Lana Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. She explained that her boss, Barry Krischer, was requesting this case be taken to the Grand Jury again. I ex lained to her I had re ested arrest warrants for Jeffrey Epstein, and . I asked

uled to leave on the 10th at 5:00 pm. On May 12, 2006, I met with ASA Lana Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. She explained that her boss, Barry Krischer, was requesting this case be taken to the Grand Jury again. I ex lained to her I had re ested arrest warrants for Jeffrey Epstein, and . I asked

uled to leave on the 10th at 5:00 pm. On May 12, 2006, I met with ASA Lana Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. She explained that her boss, Barry Krischer, was requesting this case be taken to the Grand Jury again. I ex lained to her I had re ested arrest warrants for Jeffrey Epstein, and . I asked

uled to leave on the 10th at 5:00 pm. On May 12, 2006, I met with ASA Lana Belohlavek at the State Attorney's Office. She explained that her boss, Barry Krischer, was requesting this case be taken to the Grand Jury again. I ex lained to her I had re ested arrest warrants for Jeffrey Epstein, and . I asked

arge Epstein with un- lawiul sex acts with a minor and lewd and lascivious molestation, Police Chief Michael Reiter was so angry with State Attorney Barry Krischer’s han- dling of the case that he wrote a memo See EPSTEIN, 5B > 03656-65 31E~ NW -}]08062 -G oo HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019365 --- PAGE BREAK --- wesc

consider ood and sufficient reason exists to reqiire your dis- qualification from the prose cution of these cases,” Reiter wrote in a May 1 memo to Krischer. While not commenting specifically on the Epstein case, Mike Edmondson, Spokesman for the state at- torney, said his office pre sents cases ‘other t

reasons, First, he pressed for Epstein to be charged with the more serious crimes of sexual ac- tivity with minors. Second, he slammed State Attorney Bar- ry-Xrischer in blunt language seldom used by one law- enforcement official con- cerning another because of what he perceived as that of fice’s mishandling of the

ICT OF FLORIDA | 70: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY 8 “ BEFORE GRAND J URY FGI 05-02(WPB)-Fri/No. OLY-19 YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court at the place, date and time specified below. PLACE: United States District Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West

red for captioned investigation; Grand Jur Reference: 31E-MM-108062 Serial 13 Enclosure(s): Enclosed for Miami is the server copy of the referenced Grand Jury subpoena issued by the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida on 10/06/2006 and servedc™—~——CCd@n. «10/16/2006. Details: On 10/1