Epstein Secrets

ey asked her whether she had spoken to anyone else. She said yes, a private investigator had asked her the same questions. » Jeffrey Epstein: Acosta, Krischer trade barbs oyer sweetheart deal When they subpoenaed one of Epstein’s former employees, he told them the same thing. He and a private eye had met at

of1Jnlawful s~x a~ts whh ~ lllinor and l~vvd :an.d lascivi<>us mqlestation. Pplice Chi~f Michael Reiter was so angry that he wro.te:State. Attorney Barry Krischer a memo in May suggesting he disqualify hitnselffrom the case. https:ilwWw.palmbeachdailynews,comiarticle/20060729/NEWS/190917 573 CA/Aronberg-0O102

rigge:recl tensio-qs betwe~n_poljce and. prosecutors, with then:-PalmBeach.Chief Michael R~ite,r saying in a May 2006 letter to then-State Attorney Barry Kris ch er that the chief prosecutor should disqualify himself.,, . I "I conti_nue'to find your office's treatment of these-cases highly unusual/ Reit

f law and as a measure of respect that we have for the victims' difficult decisions to come forward in this matter. In a case called United States v. Heaton, H-e-a-t-o-n-, the government filed a Rule 48 motion for leave to dismiss a charge against a defendant who allegedly committed a sexual offense again

Rule 48. I completely share that viewpoint in these circumstances, even though the facts of our case, as I said, are somewhat different from those in Heaton. I believe it is SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.O. (212) 805-0300 i i CA/Aronberg-000926 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/20

REAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 7 of 33 On September 21, 2007, Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krischer wrote the line prosecutor about the proposed agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this

21, 2007, Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krischer wrote the line prosecutor about the proposed agr

t]." Id. Indeed, it is this type of communication between prosecutors and victims that was intended by the passage of the CVRA. See United States v. Heaton 458 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (D. Utah 2006)(government motion to dismiss charge of using facility of interstate commerce to entice minors to engage in unla

EAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 7 of 33 On September 21, 2007, Palm Beach County State Attorney Krischer wrote the line prosecutor about the proposed agreement and added: "Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won't put in writing. After this

t]." Id. Indeed, it is this type of communication between prosecutors and victims that was intended by the passage of the CVRA. See United States v. Heaton 458 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (D. Utah 2006)(government motion to dismiss charge of using facility of interstate commerce to entice minors to engage in unla

" and otherwise; Assistant U.S. Attorney who implemented the directions she was given by the U.S. Attorney; former Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry , who was involved in the plea discussions and was "glad" to work a deal out for reasons 19 EFTA00027794 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-

]." Id. Indeed, it is this type of communication between prosecutors and victims that was intended by the passage of the CVRA. See United States v. Heaton, 458 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (D. Utah 2006)(government motion to dismiss charge of using facility of interstate commerce to entice minors to engage in unl