Epstein Secrets

10: To: SUNAK. Rishi Suelect Re: Arrest an Hamome. (case Her. 784) Dear George. Thank you so much for contacting me. My number Kind Regards Sarah On 4 Apr 2022. at 09:27. Rist. Sunak MP Good morning. Thank you for your mails. you wouk1 like any assistance please do provide me with your con

oast chicken. The same building Nadia was living in and the same building I think SIMONA was in as Sumina and I were both picked up together as per Sarah Kellen email! Ask Pam about Adam! You see not only did Juliet Bryant receive $125 k more in the settlement which SIMONA the administrator came up with an

and I were both picked up together as per Sarah Kellen email! Ask Pam about Adam! You see not only did

ir. Or did you think I was writing for the good of my health All of you also suppressed this information during election year! The suppression of Hunter I3iden's laptop too from the media won't come close to the repercussions of when all of you are held accountable for each of your roles in what's ha

ree computers were his private papers. As set forth in the Recarey Declaration, one of the computers was in an area that appears to be the office of Sarah Kellen and another was in the pool cabana. 4. The act of production doctrine would not have protected Epstein from producing the computers if they had rem

n an area that appears to be the office of Sarah Kellen and another was in the pool cabana. 4. The act o

tates in evaluating that claim, but Epstein has objected to the production of those documents. F.I 1Although unpublished, the case of United States' Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995), contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives a detailed analysis of the applicability of the attorn

cription Date Applied Reversed 1 PAYMENT 1112304 Total of Payments Current Subscriber Monthly Charges and C Subscriber Number Subscriber Name SARAH KELLEN Total Current Subscriber Monthly Charges and Credits Total Current Monthly Charges Account Number 0043811863 Payment Amount -419.68 SUMMARY OF

and C Subscriber Number Subscriber Name SARAH KELLEN Total Current Subscriber Monthly Charges and Cre

er Item Date Time Called Calls To i 11116 07A3P INCOMING TOTAL VOICE USAGE FOR (201)519-8733 0.00 DETAIL OF CURRENT ACTIVITY VOICE USAGE FOR Hunter Onty Charge Item Date Time Called Calls To Used Rate Description Charge 1 1103 07 50A INCOMING I MIN UNLIM MCfIL TO MOBL 2 11.133 08.34A

to so participate, through a pattern of criminal activity in violation of Florida Statutes §772.103(3)-(4). 42. Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein's and Sarah Kellen's enterprise included, at a minimum, a group of individuals associated in fact to assist Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in recruiting and procuring mino

z. r 1 1-1 2O - z) JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, C N Lc; •74 > -41, 1 n -< 73 i Defendants

denied, No. 11-85, S. Ct. 2011 WL 3055311 (Nov. 28, 2011) (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the CVRA beyond those expressly contained in the Act); see al

to so participate, through a pattern of criminal activity in violation of Florida Statutes §772.103(3)-(4). 42. Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein's and Sarah Kellen's enterprise included, at a minimum, a group of individuals associated in fact to assist Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in recruiting and procuring mino

z. r 1 1-1 2O - z) JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, C N Lc; •74 > -41, 1 n -< 73 i Defendants

denied, No. 11-85, S. Ct. 2011 WL 3055311 (Nov. 28, 2011) (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the CVRA beyond those expressly contained in the Act); see al

to so participate, through a pattern of criminal activity in violation of Florida Statutes §772.103(3)-(4). 42. Defendants, Jeffrey Epstein's and Sarah Kellen's enterprise included, at a minimum, a group of individuals associated in fact to assist Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in recruiting and procuring mino

B AD Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. . 91 c. C AMENDED COMPLAINT 61

denied, No. 11-85, S. Ct. 2011 WL 3055311 (Nov. 28, 2011) (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional remedies" into the CVRA beyond those expressly contained in the Act); see al

c) Johnson, Loretta (Cnty Court) Johnson, Nide (Gun Club) Johnson, H. Quinn (DOVE-TD) Jones, Jeffery (Set Team) Jordan, Damaris (DOVE) Jordan, Ellen (HOM) Katz Jon Kay, Steven Kalman, Rachel Kenneway, Deborah King, Angela King., Mercedes Kinsey, Charles (So Cnty) (Exec) (Appeals) (INTA

y,' and Epstein was told never to come back." CONTRIBU' Homi Furthermore, the parent of one of Epstein's youngest victims is outraged that he R Sarah aymond, t could walk without registering as a sex offender and tells Radar, "What this man others did to my daughter was horrible. He thinks that

l Call Talking Poir TPMmuckra Washington News Wonkette CULTURE All Music Gt Ms & Letter Billboard Book Slut Brooklyn Ve College Hun Cool Hunter The Daily G Deadline He Defamer Doc Reno Entertainme Hollywood F IMDB Tunes Metacritic New York R NME The Onion Pitchfork Pop Matters

,REBECCA VAN DER GRIFT,PAUL J ASCHE,SARAH P KAHLE,KENT HOUSE,NADINE BRIG

PASCALE,LUCINDA C JACKSON,JOHN T HUNTER,CATHERINE HODGE,THOMAS KOONTZ II,MR

ls gives parents choice and control over the content children can purchase (!Anoints. Mentor) and access (Content Filters) on Onside: deuces. These Ellen can be set right from a child** phone by going k) 3•IF.dia Net • °Wormer MEAN Net • Prellial Controls Tines no monthly charge to use Parents/ Contro

4- 94.4 Cdt M- Mobili To Aldine Ontat4104 N- ODeinworle 0 -Ado nonfood Cell k-Ron nib Bono S-ShiseilItlianto: T-lbret We) Calling: v-Vole Attblft4i Hunter Kern Day Date Time CL Called Call To 324 *4/07 02404714 TH ULLA)! FL DB-Dintoren OR VII ConnItto C 10 Mail, Cut 17-11norse DiMiliMW-Ni

United States hereby opposes Epstein's motion and moves for an order to compel the appearance of witnesses and production of the requested items. 'Sarah is one of Epstein's personal assistants. -5- EFTA00179104 ARGUMENT I. THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT OPPOSE THE MOTION TO INTERVENE, IN PART. The

poena, 204 F.3d 516 (4th Cir. 2000), see Response at 21-22, was simply a claim of privilege with respect to the client's identity. United States v. Hunter, 1995 WI, 12513 (N.D.111. January 6, 1995), does not, as the government would have it. "contain[] facts similar to the ones, at bar." Response at 21