Epstein Secrets

ng about the Justice Department’s im- plementation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act--an act that I co-sponsored in 2004. These questions relate to an Office of Legal Counsel (“OLC’’?) Opinion made public on May 20, 2011 and more broadly to concerns I have heard from crime victims’ advocates that the Department has

od should not be held hostage by litiga- tion and anti-grazing special interest groups. I thank my colleagues, Sen- ators ENZI, CRAPO, HATCH, HELLER, RIScH, and THUNE, in supporting ranch- ing families and this legislation. Mr. President, I ask unanimous con- sent to have printed in the REcorpD the arti

ions to provide Epstein's victims with more information about what was happening. Epstein also refers to a 2010 opinion of the Justice Department's Office of Legal (OLC), which concluded that the CVRA did not extend rights until the filing of formal charges. Epstein Remedies Br. at 32. Of course, the OLC opini

48 N.C. 671, 675-76 (1998) (holding that court cannot enforce a plea agreement for concurrent sentence where law mandated consecutive one); Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 515 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (court cannot enforce an illegal sentence below the statutory range); State v. Mazzone, 212 W.Va. 368,

ions to provide Epstein's victims with more information about what was happening. Epstein also refers to a 2010 opinion of the Justice Department's Office of Legal (OLC), which concluded that the CVRA did not extend rights until the filing of formal charges. Epstein Remedies Br. at 32. Of course, the OLC opini

48 N.C. 671, 675-76 (1998) (holding that court cannot enforce a plea agreement for concurrent sentence where law mandated consecutive one); Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 515 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (court cannot enforce an illegal sentence below the statutory range); State v. Mazzone, 212 W.Va. 368,