Epstein Secrets

so ordered. New York, NY April 4.5"; 2016 7 T W. SWEET U.S.D.J. EFTA_R1_00012013 EFTA01734223

99 pages of emails with communications involving various combinations of Brett Jaffe, Esq. ("Jaffe"), Mark Cohen, Esq. ("Cohen"), Philip Barden ("Barden"), Ross Gow ("Gown), Brian Basham ("Basham"), and The facts that follow summarize Defendant's assertions regarding her relationship to each of th

on January 6, 2015, #1030-43. c. Jaffe on March 15, 2011, #1000-19.2 Gow on January 2, 2011, #1020-26. Gow and Basham on January 2, 2015, #1027- Barden #1059-83, Some emails were forwarded or carbon copied ("CC'd") later in the chain, leading to some overlap and duplication. Whether one party or

rk, N.Y. March 31, 2017 12:08 p.m. HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, District Judge APPEARANCES BOIES, SCHIL

hey have the burden of proving that what Ms. Maxwell said was false. That's what is at issue. We have to look at Ms. Maxwell's statement issued by Barden and Gow and then go backwards from there. And the burden on the plaintiff is proving falsity of that statement. It is not the situation where -- wh

MI6 14. Amanda Ellison (live) 15. 16. Phillip W. Esplin, Ed.D. (live) 7131 E. Buena Terra Way Sc

d, the media obtained copies of the motion. At issue is a January 2, 2015, statement prepared by Ms. Maxwell's British solicitor Philip Barden. Mr. Barden sent the statement to Ms. Maxwell for approval and, following approval, caused Mr. Gow to send (via email) the statement to six to thirty members of

3. (live) 14. Amanda Ellison (live) 16. Philli W. Es lin, Ed.D. live) 17. Anthony Figueroa (video)

d, the media obtained copies of the motion. At issue is a January 2, 2015, statement prepared by Ms. Maxwell's British solicitor Philip Barden. Mr. Barden sent the statement to Ms. Maxwell for approval and, following approval, caused Mr. Gow to send (via email) the statement to six to thirty members of

1, 2017 12:08 p.m. 10 Before: 11 HON. ROBERT W. SWEET, 12 District Judge 13 APPEARANCES 14

the burden of proving that what Ms. Maxwell said was false. 16 That's what is at issue. We have to look at Ms. Maxwell's 17 statement issued by Barden and Gow and then go backwards from 18 there. And the burden on the plaintiff is proving falsity of 19 that statement. It is not the situation whe