Epstein Secrets

arry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dexter W. Lehtinen, U.S. Atty., and Susan Hill P002011, As

did not assert that he had complied with these requirements, but that he would. The Court reset the hearing for June 25, 2009. Petitioner filed a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential (A-13) on June 11, 2009. In it, Epstein cited four reasons the NPA should remain under seal: 1. to prevent a serious and imminent thre

ant to motions to unseal, filed by non-parties, E.W., B.B. and Palm Beach Newspapers d/b/a The Palm B

t granted both motions to intervene, but deferred ruling on the motions to unseal pending a later hearing (A-13). The next day, Mr. Epstein filed a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential (A-13). Mr. Epstein alleged that the documents should remain confidential to prevent a serious imminent threat to the fair, impartial,

red to by proper name. Non-party interveners, E.W., B.B. and The Post are referred to as E.W., B.B.

3222 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-011 SDNY_GM_00331621 EFTA_00204347 EFTA02729333 The next day, June 11, 2009, Mr. Epstein filed a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential (A-13). Mr. Epstein alleged that the documents should remain confidential to prevent a serious imminent threat to the fair, impartial

June 10, 2009 but took no immediate action on E. W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Uns

did not assert that he had complied with these requirements, but that he would. The Court reset the hearing for June 25, 2009. Petitioner filed a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential (A-13) on June 11, 2009. In it, Epstein cited four reasons the NPA should remain under seal: 1. to prevent a serious and imminent thre

order dated June 25, 2009 on: a) Non-party, E.W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Unse

rvene, but deferred ruling on the motions to unseal pending a later hearing (A-13). EFTA00180643 The next day, June 11, 2009, Mr. Epstein filed a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential (A-13). Mr. Epstein alleged that the documents should remain confidential to prevent a serious imminent threat to the fair, impartial

of Judicial Administration 2.420(d)(5) (A-10). E.W. alleged that the proper procedures had not been

ne, but deferred ruling on the motions to unseal pending a later hearing (A-13). 5 EFTA00231137 The next day, June 11, 2009, Mr. Epstein filed a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential (A-13). Mr. Epstein alleged that the documents should remain confidential to prevent a serious imminent threat to the fair, impartial

AM FILED BY BRADLEY EDWARDS, ESQ. RE:NON PARTY E W.'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER SEALING AND UNSEAL RECO

did not assert that he had complied with these requirements, but that he would. The Court reset the hearing for June 25, 2009. Petitioner filed a Motion to Make Court Records Confidential (A-13) on June 11, 2009. In it, Epstein cited four reasons the NPA should remain under seal: 1. to prevent a serious and imminent thre