Epstein Secrets

arry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dexter W. Lehtinen, U.S. Atty., and Susan Hill P002011, As

M.D. Fla. 2005) 23 Oregonian Publishing Co. v. United States District Court 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990) 9 U.S. v. Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651 (E.D. Va. 2007) 23 United States v. Kooistra, 796 F.3d 1390 (11th Cir. 1986) 9 State Cases Anderson v. E.T., 862 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) 8 Barron v.

ETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND RESPONSE TO E.W.'S MOTION TO DISIMISS PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISD

e grand jury," including "the strategy or direction of the investigation . . . and the like"); United States v. Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651, 655-56 (E.D. Va. 2007) (explaining that the rule protects disclosure of "the strategy or direction of a grand jury investigation" or "the details of the grand jury's pas

FL 33401 William Berger, Esq. Attorney For: E. W. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 E. Las Olas Blvd

tti v. Stephens, 940 So. 2d 1217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) 16 Sabo! v. Bennett, 672 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) 9 U.S. v. Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651 (E.D. Va. 2007). 15 Statutes § 69.081(4), Florida Statutes 13 Rules Administrative Order 2.303-9/08 12 Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(2) 14 F

June 10, 2009 but took no immediate action on E. W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Uns

(M.D. Fla. 2005) 23 Oregonian Publishing Co. I United States District Court, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990) 9 U.S. I Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651 (E.D. Va. 2007) 23 United States I Kooistra, 796 F.3d 1390 (11th Cir. 1986) 9 State Cases Anderson I E.T„ 862 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) 8 Barron I Flo

AM FILED BY BRADLEY EDWARDS, ESQ. RE:NON PARTY E W.'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER SEALING AND UNSEAL RECO

(M.D. Fla. 2005) 23 Oregonian Publishing Co.'. United States District Court, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990) 9 U.S. I Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651 (E.D. Va. 2007) 23 United States'. Kooistra, 796 F.3d 1390 (11th Cir. 1986) 9 State Cases Anderson I E.T., 862 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) 8 Barron'. Fl

ed in this 10 The Post adopts and incorporates E.W.'s arguments and analysis on this issue in additi

). In other words, Rule 6 is implicated if disclosure would reveal secret inner workings of the grand jury. U.S. . Rosen, 471 F. Supp. 2d 651, 654 (E.D. Va. 2007). Disclosure of details of a government investigation that is independent of a parallel grand jury proceeding does not violate Rule 6. Id. Statemen