Epstein Secrets

1 Robert C. Jose s re gt1tIo. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25

slated with an expectation that the principle will apply except 'when a statutory purpose to the contrary is evident."' Id. (quoting Jsbrandtsen Co. I. Johnson, 343 U.S. 779, 783 (1952)). In this case, however, the Court need not take anything "as given." Even if the statute's language were not clear—which

Sting Wis. State of Wisconsin'. Robins, 646 N.W. 2d 287 (Wis. 2002) Internet Internet chat room

exclude pre-Miranda statements and evidence from bag denied. See U.S., Vasquez, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2339 (D. Me. 2003) infra N.D.N.Y. U.S. I. Johnson, . 2005 U.S. Dist LEXIS 52 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Internet Internet chat room; 37 yr-old male met 13 yr-old; 16 yr-old and one other under 18 yrs-old

, petition for cert. filed,No. 02-11197, — U.S.L.W. ---- (U.S. June 9, 2003), where the defendant ha

y constitutes reversible error. Conclusion For these reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. AFFIRMED C.A.7 (Ind.),2007. U.S. I. Johnson 495 F.3d 536 END OF DOCUMENT C 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. Page 9 hups://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=F