Epstein Secrets

letin, April 2005, Vo. 2, No. 1 at 1; July 2004, Vol. 1, No 7. at 6; and January 2004, Vol. 1, No. 1, at I, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney General Ashcroft, and former Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Acosta that human

l. 1, No. 1, at I, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney Gene

OVT EFTA00310837 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Kenneth W. Starr To Call Writer Directly-. VIA FACSIMILE

ecause it authorized agents to seize everything, even if unrelated to the offense under investigation and even if wholly personal); United States v. Clough, 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003)(warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); U

Bulletin, April 2005, Vo. 2, No. 1 at 1; July 2004, Vol. 1, No 7. at 6; and Jan 2004, Vol. I, No. I, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General former Attorney General Ashcroft, and former Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Acosta that human trafficki

l. I, No. I, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General former Attorney General Ashcro

because it authorized agents to seize everything, even if unrelated to the offense under investigation and even if wholly personal); United States. Clough; 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003)(warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); U

etin, April 2005, Vo. 2, No. 1 at 1; July 2004, Vol. 1, No 7. at 6,. and January 2004, Vol. 1, No. 1, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney General Ashcroft, and former Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Acosta that human

l. 1, No. 1, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney Gene

ecause it authorized agents to seize everything, even if unrelated to the offense under investigation and even if wholly personal); United States v. Clough; 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003)(warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); U

letin, April 2005, Vo. 2, No. I at 1; July 2004, Vol. 1, No 7. at 6; and January 2004, Vol. I, No. 1, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney General Ashcroft, and fonner Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Acosta that human

l. I, No. 1, at 1, 3 (reflecting the positions of President Bush, Attorney General Gonzalez, former Attorney Gene

because it authorized agents to seize everything even if unrelated to the offense under investigation and even if wholly personal); United States'. Clough, 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003Xwarrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); Un

hold 40,000 books); see also In re Search of 3817 W. West.End, 321 F. Supp.2d 953, 959 (ND. Ill. 2004

use "what the government seeks is a license to roam through everything- n the computer without limitation and without standards"); United States v. Clough, 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D. Me. 2003) (warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search and no references to statutes, cri

hold 40,000 books); see also In re Search of 3817 W. West End, 321 F. Supp.2d 953.959 (N.D. Ill. 2004

se "what the government seeks is a license to roam through everything_ in the computer without limitation and without standards"); United States v. Clough, 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D. Me. 2003) (warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search and no references to statutes, cri