Epstein Secrets

Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein De

On or about July 15, 2004, DefendantIMEMS placed one or niorii telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. (67) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendan caused Jane Doe #9 to make one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10. (68) On or about July 17, 2004, Defendant telephone c

, petition for cert. filed,No. 02-11197, — U.S.L.W. ---- (U.S. June 9, 2003), where the defendant ha

14. The district court observed that "the lessee's consent to the instant search of the spare bedroom provides an independent g reason to deny the Defendan ' . n to suppress. See United Stain 979 1 i 2c1 77, 79 (6th Cir.1992); unite tales Clutter, 914 F.2d 775, 777 (6th r.1990), cert. denied,499 U

ttached judgments of conviction (Exhibit "A".) E.W. presently has a pending civil action in this cou

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely m mad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosu

new issues, and any other relevant circumstance." W. Finally, an intervention is generally considered

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely ad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosure

this matter. ttespeetililly submitted, Kenneth W. Starr Kirkland & Ellis LLP Joc D. Whitley Alst

lephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #15. (147) On or about April 1, 2005, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a note for Defendan FFREY EPSTEIN's review that read: "10:30 [Jane Doe #15]/[Jane Doe #10] on Fri around 2'Oclock". (148) In or around June 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EP