Epstein Secrets

08-80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagl

the following case as supplemental authority in connection with the above referenced Motions to Compel and Replies thereto: 1. Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (ED. P.A. 2001) (denying protective order where alleged sexual assault victim did not demonstrate a serious specific injury and allowing Defen

08-80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagl

the following case as supplemental authority in connection with the above referenced Motions to Compel and Replies thereto: 1. Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (ED. P.A. 2001) (denying protective order where alleged sexual assault victim did not demonstrate a serious specific injury and allowing Defen

08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Hagle

KAM Document 149 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/09/2009 Page 7 of 13 Doe 101 v. Epstein Page 7 must be shown with specificity. See Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D. P.A. 2001). Thus, Plaintiffs have not met their burden of persuasion. N. Plaintiffs fail to show good cause in that they have not clearl

nally Deprived Children" (with Harriet Lubin, M.S.W.), presented at the American Association of Psych

Page 9 of 15 assault. See, e.g., Aware Woman Cir., 253 F.3d at 685 (abortion); ■ 213 F.R.D. at III (infection with hepatitis B); Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D.Pa.200 I) (sexual assault victim); Smith, 105 F.Supp.2d at 42 (sexual assault victim); WGA v. Priority Pharmacy, Inc., 184 F.R.D. 616, 61

Sat igatBureau of the Town of Palm Beach 3101 N.W. 16th Terrace Pompano Beach, FL 33064 Tel: (877)

the following case as supplemental authority in connection with the above referenced Motions to Compel and Replies thereto: 1. Doe v. Evans, 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D. P.A. 2001) (denying protective order where alleged sexual assault victim did not demonstrate a serious specific injury and allowing Defe