Epstein Secrets

e. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Although L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe have sought to join in the motion f

subject to reasonable interpretation, though it may not be expanded beyond the meaning of its terms absent notice and an opportunity to be heard." Georgia Power Co. v. N.L.R.B., 484 F.3d 1288, 1291 (11th Cir. 2007). Moreover, any ambiguities or uncertainties in such a court order must be construed in a light fa

imely." United States v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (11th Cir. 1983). "'Timeliness' is not precisely measurable," Brown ex reL O'Neil v. Bush, 194 Fed. Appx. 879, 882 (11th Cir. 2006), and is "not limited to chronological considerations but is to be determined from all the circumstances."

s of appeal, he would likely be limited to the issues raised by the parties and unable to assert his own individual interests on appeal. See, e.g., Georgia Power Co. v. Teleport Communications, 8 EFTA00617887 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 207 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2013 Page 9 of 11 Atlanta, Inc., 346

s v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (1 1 th Cir. 1983). "'Timeliness' is not precisely measurable," 2 EFTA00583796 Brown a rel. O'Neil v. Bush, 194 Fed. Appx. 879, 882 (11th Cir. 2006), and is "not limited to chronological considerations but is to be determined from all the circumstances."

s of appeal, he would likely be limited to the issues raised by the parties and unable to assert his own individual interests on appeal. See, e.g., Georgia Power Co. v. Teleport Communications, Atlanta, Inc., 346 F.3d 1047, 1049 (11th Cir. 2003)(1e]xcept for extraordinary cases, an intervenor is precluded from r