Epstein Secrets

ng Company; Logan Manufac- turing Company; Thomas W. Kimmer- ly, (83-1803), Defendants-Appellants, an

cts un- derlying the communication. Upjohn Co. 12. The court below erroneously applied the Ten- nessee law of attorney-client privilege. Al- though Federal Rule of Evidence 501 does not apply in the instant case, we follow it by analo- I United States, 449 U.S. 383, 395, 101 S.Ct. 677, 685, 66 LEd.2d 584 (1981). In genera

, Jr., Jacksonville, Ha., for appellants. Robert W. Merkie, Curtis S. Fallgatter, M. Alan Ceballos,

naed materials are privileged. Specifically, the District Attorney argues that the state grand jury secrecy law creates a federal privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 501. The Court finds this argument without merit. [8] Evidentiary privileges protect confidential communications between persons in special rela

, Jr., Jacksonville, Ha., for appellants. Robert W. Merkle, Ctirtis S. Fallgatter, M. Alan Ceballos,

naed materials are privileged. Specifically, the District Attorney argues that the state grand jury secrecy law creates a federal privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 501. The Court fords this argument without merit. [8] Evidentiary privileges protect confidential communications between persons in special rela

Jr., Jacksonville, Fla.. for appellants. Robert W. Mettle, Curtis S. FaLipner, M. Alan Ccballos, As

naed materials are privileged. Specifically, the District Attorney argues that the state grand jury secrecy law creates a federal privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 501. The Court finds this argument without merit. [8] Evidentiary privileges protect confidential communications between persons in special rela

, Jr., Jacksonville, Ha., for appellants. Robert W. Merkle, Curds S. Fallgarter, M. Alan Ceballos, A

naed materials are privileged. Specifically, the District Attorney argues that the state grand jury secrecy law creates a federal privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 501. The Court finds this argument without merit. [8] Evidentiary privileges protect confidential communications between persons in special rela

Jr., Jacksonville. Fla., for appellants. Robert W. Mericle, Curtis S. Fallgatter, M. Alan Ceballos,

naed materials are privileged. Specifically, the District Attorney argues that the state grand jury secrecy law creates a federal privilege under Federal Rule of Evidence 501. The Court finds this argument without merit. [8] Evidentiary privileges protect confidential communications between persons in special rela