Epstein Secrets

s evidence retrie\red following a search ofEpsteinls home, ~hawed that many ofthe girls involved were under the a'ge of 18. According to D_etective Recarey, the lead detective on the_ case, one of the photos re~ove:d frotn the master I I i I Greenberg Traurig, PA ■ 40_1 East Las Olas Bouleva_rd, Sui

s involved were under the age of 18. According to Detective Recarey, the lead detective on the case, one of the photo

y constitutional free speech principles, as a testifying grand jury witness is free to disclose her grand jury testimony . In I Butterworth v. Smith, the United States Supreme Court, weighing the competing interests of grand jury secrecy and the First Amendment, held unconstitutional Section 905;.27’s prohibition on a witness rev

suspiciously, they were not provided by just any defense attorney on this rather large defense team. They were provided by one attorney according to Detective Recarey. Detective Recarey testified under oath that the flight logs were provided to him by Alan Dershowitz. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 9

provided by just any defense attorney on this rather large defense team. They were provided by one attorney according to Detective Recarey. Detective Recarey testified under oath that the flight logs were provided to him by Alan Dershowitz. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 92 So one of the th

tially determined who was going to be President of the most powerful country in the world. There were two attorneys who argued that case in front of the United States Supreme Court, and arguing for the Democratic Presidential Candidate, Al Gore, was David Boies. He had put his credibility on the line in arguing the Bush versus

21 before you went and testified in the Grand Jury? 22 A. No. 23 Q. You don't remember that. 24 A. No. 25 0. Do you remember Detective Recarey? Did you Sale M.I .,.••• MOVE. Ph. - Fax. 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 500 - West Palm Beach, FL 33401 NOM, EFTA00232229 Case 9:08-cv-8

t drive you? 18 A. I think my dad. Oh, my dad; my dad drove 19 me. 20 Q. Your dad drove you? 21 A. Yes, sir. 22 Q. So your testimony is Detective Recarey did 23 not drive you, correct? 24 MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. /asked and 25 answered. Ph. - Fax. 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 500 - West P

eeding which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See a Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court can

d Jury’s indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department’s raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey’s unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcriptio

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey’s unedited written reports of witness statements

g out of this case, she filed the “Declaration of Joseph Recarey,” attaching the state detective’s affidavit in su

1978), the search warrant affidavit in this case reveals knowing and reckless falsehoods and omitted material information. This is precisely the type the United States Supreme Court sought to guard against. The age of the alleged victims, and of Mr. Epstein’s intent in that regard, is an element of the crimes that must be proven

aw enforcement authorities, (See Police Detective Joe Recarey Depo. at 281, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, No. 9:08

nforcement authorities, (See Police Detective Joe Recarey Depo. at 281, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, No. 9:08

al counsel in many high profile cases before I had the chance to work with him, including representing the Vice President of the United States before the United States Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore. And HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016201 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 36-4 Filed 07/03/19 Page 6 of 6 while I did not kn