Epstein Secrets

pstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 and OLY.64,Nu. F(31 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla. July 31, 2007). At the time she tiled Detective Recarey's affidavit, she knew it contained numerous material misrepresentations, including gross misstatements of witness statements and other evidence. Secon

Jury's indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department's raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcript

d serious misrepresentations before a court. On July 31, 2007, in the grand-jury litigation arising out of this case, she filed the "Declaration of Joseph Recarey," attaching the state detective's affidavit in support of a search warrant for Epstein's house. Sec In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum OLY-63 an

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements

rom former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS's assessment of its limited review of Mils case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States A

on Jeff was unable to touch her buttocks". There is no mention in her There were three Probable Cause Affidavits prepared and executed by Detective Recarey on the same date. The affidavits arc in all material respects identical and we here refer to the one concerning Epstein. It is annexed at Tab 2. Be

ed behind Epstein's desk". Clearly omitted from both the Police Report and the Probable Cause Affidavit is the fact that the PBPD, and specifically Detective Recarey, knew about the cameras since the cameras were installed in 2003, with the help of the PBPD, to address the then of cash from Epstein's home. This

een. I'm 19 now this last March." (Sworn Statement of 10/12/05). 4 In addition to giving a sworn statement at the PBPD Station, conversations with Detective Recarey while being transported to and from the station were also recorded, This excerpt is taken from the recording of ;raveling from the station. 08-807

PRESS LAW °mete or Gnaw B. Lggcouic, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 140 EAST 7STN STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021 July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Fsq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street

same things that you had asked me to do earlier is improper meddling in civil litigation. Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have EFTA00289827 JAY Pi LEFICOWITZ, ESQ. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 3 OF 5 already been submitted to the Office on several oc

Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Conn. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and expecte, so no one should have access t

Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey's investigation that have EFTA00289827 JAY Pi

d victim notification letter and the statute. I would note that the United States provided tide draft letter to defense as a courtesy. in addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Simian already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. !agree that Section 3771

m Gerald Lefcourt (Appendix A), you will see that most of the letter is an attack on the police report and probable cause affidavit drafted by Det. Joe Recarey from PBPD. Neither document is ideal and his interviews of the girls and other investigative steps had some problems (although did an incredibly in-

dn't wait" for her to turn 18 so that he could take them on trips. 52 EFTA00234568 Very early in the investigation, the FBI and I decided to put Recarey's police report and PC Affidavit to the side and to look at the case with fresh eyes. The facts discussed herein are based upon a personal review o

bject Re: Operation Leap Year Date May 1, 2007 (Revised 9/13/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08)' To From R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region , Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval f

earch of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

gation was initiated, namely by Palm Beach Police Detective Recarey. Although Det. Recarey's questionable actions un

EOURMW.ccen RENATO C. STABILE 11104110WONSEinvcom FAITH A. FRIEDMAN filedmeneldwurlaw.wco BY HAND DELIVERY June 25, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th

olice Department. See, e.g., Police Detective Joe Recarey Depo. at 281, Jane Doe No. 2'. Epstein, No. 9:08

stein, No. 502008CA037319 XXXX-MB-AB (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. Nov. 23, 2009) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 28); see also Depo. of Police Detective Joe Recarey at 301-302 and 309-10, Jane Doe No. 2'. Epstein, No. 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM (S.D. Fla. Mar. 19, 2010) (excerpts attached as Exhibit 29) Later, Dershowi

elcourew.com RENATO E. STABILE FabliSokswilawoom FAITH A. FRIEDMAN IM•cimweelcoutlaw.com BY FEDERAL EXPRESS July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4'h

earch of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

gation was initiated, namely by Palm Beach Police Detective Recarey. Although Det. Recarey's questionable actions un

RATION IPS EAST 70' STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORIELOOEI GERALD B. LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH FAITH A. FRIEDMAN June 25, 2007 BY HAND DELIVERY Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th Street Miami, F

search of 358 El Brilb, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

GERALD 0. LEFCOURT leloarypekouituroccom SHERYL E RE1CR Nv C. STABILE ow FRIEDM•N -Oln June 25, 2007 BY HAND DELIVERY Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Matthew Menchel, Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4th