Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
5 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tions at a Mar. 8, 2010, deposition, id. at 10 & Ex. D. 8. Annexed hereto as Exhibit E is a copy of pertinent pages of the Complaint in Epstein v. Rothstein, Edwards No. 50 2009 CAO 40800 (Cir. Ct., 15th Jud. Cir., Palm Beach Co., Dec. 7, 2009), as downloaded from http://www.scribd.com/doc/23947743/121
NTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, ilr DLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ., individually, Defendants. 50 2009 cAo 03 (JUI0X04B COMPLAINT COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING
ery v. Encana Energy Servs.. Inc. 33 Med. L. Rptr. 1413 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (Preska, J.). 4. Annexed hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of L.W. v. Knox County Bd. of Educ.. 36 Med. L. Rptr. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008). 5. Annexed hereto as Exhibit C is the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
tions at a Mar. 8, 2010, deposition, id. at 10 & Ex. D. 8. Annexed hereto as Exhibit E is a copy of pertinent pages of the Complaint in Epstein v. Rothstein, Edwards & L.M. No. 50 2009 CAO 40800 (Cir. Ct., 15th Jud. Cir., Palm Beach Co., Dec. 7, 2009), as downloaded from http://www.scribd.com/doc/2394774
NTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Complex Litigation, Fla. R. Civ. Pro. 1.201 CASE NO. Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, ilr DLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and ., individually, Defendants. 50 2009 cAo 03 (JUI0X04B COMPLAINT COPY RECEIVED FOR FILING
ery v. Encana Energy Servs.. Inc. 33 Med. L. Rptr. 1413 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (Preska, J.). 4. Annexed hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of L.W. v. Knox County Bd. of Educ.. 36 Med. L. Rptr. 1721 (E.D. Tenn. 2008). 5. Annexed hereto as Exhibit C is the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nsel was an attempt to publicize and to sensationalize the circumstances so as to increase the value of at least the claims that were held by the Rothstein firm. MR. SCAROLA: Which I think is what DRAFT ONLY !!!! NOT PROOFREAD EFTA00792927 118 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
may recall -- we have already made reference to the timing of the filing of that federal case that we were obliged to file within two years after L.W. coming of age. She was about to celebrate her 20th birthday and it needed to be filed within that time. THE COURT: There were statute of limitat
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (114)
Entities connected to both Scott Rothstein and L.W.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,321 w/ Scott·3 w/ L.W.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON1,054 w/ Scott·4 w/ L.W.
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON714 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON485 w/ Scott·3 w/ L.W.
George W. Bush
PERSON432 w/ Scott·4 w/ L.W.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON236 w/ Scott·3 w/ L.W.
Marc Rich
PERSON132 w/ Scott·3 w/ L.W.
the Southern District
LOCATION123 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
Palm Beach County
LOCATION110 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
Rosenfeldt
PERSON90 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
Prince Charles
PERSON72 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
South Florida
LOCATION71 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
Bill Richardson
PERSON55 w/ Scott·3 w/ L.W.
Michael Fisten
PERSON54 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
BE
Berger
PERSON52 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
RA
Russell Adler
PERSON48 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
Complex Litigation
ORGANIZATION44 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION38 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
WB
William Berger
PERSON37 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.
Stephen Hawking
PERSON36 w/ Scott·2 w/ L.W.