Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"or Mr. Edwards as a Defendant in the Epstein I. Rothstein case" wished to file, disclose or make available
e Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. ff. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved by the District Court
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"or Mr. Edwards as a Defendant in the Epstein I. Rothstein case" wished to file, disclose or make available
e Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. ff. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved by the District Court
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n light of said disagreement, the parties jointly stipulated that to the extent Plaintiffs' Counsel "or Mr. Edwards as a Defendant in the Epstein v. Rothstein case" wished to file, disclose or make available to anyone else the subject Correspondence, said Counsel or Mr. Edwards must first provide Epstein'
he Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. V. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved by the District Court
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
n light of said disagreement, the parties jointly stipulated that to the extent Plaintiffs' Counsel "or Mr. Edwards as a Defendant in the Epstein v. Rothstein case" wished to file, disclose or make available to anyone else the subject Correspondence, said Counsel or Mr. Edwards must first provide Epstein'
he Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. V. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved by the District Court
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
"or Mr. Edwards as a Defendant in the Epstein I. Rothstein case" wished to file, disclose or make available
e Court has jurisdiction to enforce the stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation. See American Disability Assn., Inc. ff. Chmielarz, 289 F.3d 1315, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002). The stated wishes of the parties as set forth in the Joint Stipulation and as approved by the District Court
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (29)
Entities connected to both Scott Rothstein and Chmielarz
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON1,321 w/ Scott·7 w/ Chmielarz
Bradley Edwards
PERSON1,054 w/ Scott·7 w/ Chmielarz
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON714 w/ Scott·2 w/ Chmielarz
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON485 w/ Scott·7 w/ Chmielarz
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON320 w/ Scott·2 w/ Chmielarz
Paul Cassell
PERSON305 w/ Scott·2 w/ Chmielarz
Kenneth Marra
PERSON236 w/ Scott·7 w/ Chmielarz
Weissing
PERSON174 w/ Scott·2 w/ Chmielarz
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON148 w/ Scott·7 w/ Chmielarz
JA
Jaffe
PERSON152 w/ Scott·2 w/ Chmielarz
JA
Joseph L. Ackerman
PERSON99 w/ Scott·2 w/ Chmielarz
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION51 w/ Scott·5 w/ Chmielarz
CH
Chambers
PERSON42 w/ Scott·5 w/ Chmielarz
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION38 w/ Scott·5 w/ Chmielarz
JN
JANE DOE NO
PERSON22 w/ Scott·5 w/ Chmielarz
D.E.
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Scott·6 w/ Chmielarz
the State Court
ORGANIZATION17 w/ Scott·5 w/ Chmielarz
MB AG
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Scott·2 w/ Chmielarz
Justice Department Complaint
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Scott·5 w/ Chmielarz
the Internal Justice Department
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Scott·5 w/ Chmielarz