thout requesting them first and giving Epstein the opportunity to object and a Court to rule. See [D.E. 118], Epstein v. Edwards, 502009CA40800XXXX MB AG, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. At this point there is no reason for Mr. Epstein to become involved in the case where Edwar

mmary Judgment without requesting them first and giving Epstein the opportunity to object and a Court to rule. Epstein v. Edwards, 502009CA40800XXXX MB AG, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. If the documents are used outside the context of a court proceeding, to advance a legislat

laintiff to a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG. The action is entitled Jeffrey Epstein, Plaintiff vs. Scott Rothstein, individually, Bradley J. Edwards, individually, and L.M., individually. 5.

he U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800)COCX MB AG, in the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida. —Additional reporting by Carolina Bolado. Editing by Jill Coffey. View commen

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Additional reporting by Nathan Hale. Editing by Edrienne Su. Update: This story has

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, In the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Additional reporting by Carolina Bolado. Editing by Bruce Goldman. AI Content 6 200

n v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). The result of that subpoena was the production from the RRA trustee of approximately 27,000 emails to be deliv

n v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). 4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein served a subpoena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("

the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. The state court case is Epstein v. Rothstein et al., case number 50-2009CA04800XXXX MB AG, in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Florida. --Editing by Adam LoBelia. EFTA00805054

v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M., Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Palm Beach County, Florida Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit") to the RRA trustee, were 1 EFTA00808140 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6382 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 7 to be print

leged that Rothstein had engaged in a fraud against him. Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and Case No. 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (Cir. Ct. of the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, FL). 24. and Edwards answered the complaint, denying all allegations against them and

n To MACKE IN flOKIDA AND O2tOMOO JUSTICE COUNSEL Sent By E-mail Only Jeffrey Epstein Re: Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CA 040800MB AG Dear Jeffrey: We have now filed the above-referenced lawsuit. It represents the work not only of my office but as well the input from you, Darren,

1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). /

18/11 Page 3 of 5 Scott Rothstein, individually, Bradley J. Edwards, individually and L.M., individually, bearing case number 50-2009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG. The subpoena was directed to the Trustee in this case as the Trustee had possession of the documents at issue. 4. On October 13, 2010, the Razorb