17
Total Mentions
17
Documents
191
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
EFTA00206520
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
EFTA00206609
tion. 4. On August 26, 2010, counsel for the Plaintiff served notice of its intent to use the Correspondence in two court proceedings, an internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, and other, essentially public matters. It is also anticipated that the documents will be released to the media. A copy of the Notice of
EFTA00208339
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
EFTA00208438
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
EFTA00212193
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
EFTA00212438
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
EFTA00213902
tion. 4. On August 26, 2010, counsel for the Plaintiff served notice of its intent to use the Correspondence in two court proceedings, an internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, and other, essentially public matters. It is also anticipated that the documents will be released to the media. A copy of the Notice of
EFTA00222321
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
EFTA00235238
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
EFTA00235286
tion. 4. On August 26, 2010, counsel for the Plaintiff served notice of its intent to use the Correspondence in two court proceedings, an internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, and other, essentially public matters. It is also anticipated that the documents will be released to the media. A copy of the Notice of
EFTA00612476
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
EFTA00614065
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
EFTA00614086
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
EFTA00615537
ed the State Court is in the best position to determine whether the evidence is admissible in the state proceeding and that insofar as the internal Justice Department Complaint procedure, because Epstein is not a party to that suit, without moving for and obtaining leave to intervene, Epstein has no standing to raise objec
EFTA00229916_sub_003 - EFTA00229916_277
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
EFTA00230494_sub_003 - EFTA00230494_277
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p
EFTA00177007_sub_002 - EFTA00177007_194
propriate institution" for the CVRA was the Justice Department, as the Magistrate Judge thought that Jane Doe was proceeding by way of an "internal Justice Department Complaint procedure." Of course, Jane Doe is not proceeding here by way of the internal Justice Department procedure, but rather the statutorily authorized p

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Kenneth Marra
PersonAmerican judge
Jane Doe
PersonPseudonym for anonymous victims/witnesses in Epstein legal proceedings

Bradley Edwards
PersonAmerican attorney who represented Epstein victims, author of Relentless Pursuit
Maria Farmer
PersonAmerican visual artist

Paul Cassell
PersonUnited States federal judge

Department of Justice
OrganizationUnited States Department of Justice, federal executive department responsible for law enforcement

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
Robert D. Critton
PersonIndividual referenced in Epstein legal documents
Scott Rothstein
PersonAmerican criminal
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
OrganizationLaw firm (Fistos & Lehrman)

S.J. Quinney College of Law
OrganizationLaw school associated with the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Chambers
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
Joseph L. Ackerman
PersonAttorney at Fowler White Burnett, involved in Epstein legal proceedings in Palm Beach

Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)

Abby Goodnough
PersonAmerican journalist
Victim's Petition
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents

Salt Lake City
LocationCity in and county seat of Salt Lake County, Utah, United States and the capital of Utah

Jose Lambiet
PersonPerson referenced in documents