Epstein Secrets

th a list of the statutes that were the subject of the investigation. On June 26, 2007, Mr. Mr. M, AUSA and FAUSA—, and two FBI agents met with Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. During that meeting, Professor Dershowitz and other members of the defense team presented legal

, AUSA and FAUSA—, and two FBI agents met with Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. During that meeting, Professor Dershowitz and other members of the defense team presented legal and factual arguments against a federal indictment. Counsel for the defense also requested the

urt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. During that meeting, Professor Dershowitz and other members of the defense team presented l

, AUSA and FAUSA—, and two FBI agents met with Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly

On or about July 15, 2004, DefendantIMEMS placed one or niorii telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. (67) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendan caused Jane Doe #9 to make one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10. (68) On or about July 17, 2004, Defendant telephone c

ng but not limited to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, former Independent Counsel and Solicitor Genera

cluding but not limited to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, former Independent Counsel and Solic

fcourt, Esq. and Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq., as well as numerous other nationally-renowned lawyers, including but not limited to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, former Independent Counsel and Solicitor General of the United States Kenneth Starr, just to name a few, entered into a global resolution of state

lephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #15. (147) On or about April 1, 2005, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a note for Defendan FFREY EPSTEIN's review that read: "10:30 [Jane Doe #15]/[Jane Doe #10] on Fri around 2'Oclock". (148) In or around June 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EP

ecessary to do so if he wishes. Third, I would like to address the issue raised.regarding Florida Statute Section 796.03. At our meeting, Professor Dershowitz took the position that Mr. Epstein believes that his conduct does not satisfy the elements of this offense. His assertion raises for me substantial

Florida Statute Section 796.03. At our meeting, Professor Dershowitz took the position that Mr. Epstein believes that

In or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $200 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. (16) In or around 2003, Defendan placed a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way. (17) On or abou

xie Highway, West Pahnl3each, EL 3.340 . Ow.: ; I . • • ; .141 1,.0 i • : ., - ' . . i I: ! . - . : • . • - .•:il : r !, .!• . I Alan qoldberger; EN:, Atterbuty Goldberger, et al, 250 S.:AnStrialitair;Aire., Ste; 1400, West IN; ... ': ' Palm Beach, FL 33401..(4a: . ); and Bradley

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely m mad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosu

or Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) and on, Jr. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely ad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosure