Epstein Secrets

mber of the Federal Communications Commission and Alan Davidson of Maryland, to be Assistant Secretary

ctive at reducing the risk of hospitalization and death in high-risk people, lower than the S0% efficacy first announced. The New York Times (11/30, Robbins, Zimmer) reported that due to the FDA panel's vote of support, Merck's pill "could be authorized for use in the United States within days and avail

r LLP, Washington, D.C.; [" .2] PHILIP D. ANKER, ALAN E. SCHOENFELD, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and

SHEEL KIRPALANI, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY; ROY T. ENGLERT, JR., MARK T. STANCIL, ALAN E. UNTEREINER, MATTHEW M. MADDEN, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee. IRA S. DIZENGOFF, A

ed journal, and remains uncited as far as I know. Alan Rogers, a biologist at University of Utah, publis

I learned from these lectures that Gustav Cassel had published the same idea in his The Nature and Necessity of Interest in 1903. I hunted that down. Robbins misremembered in telling his students that Cassel had arrived at the idea independently. In fact Cassel and Robbins both quote the same excerpts from

after being personally recruited as a trader by Alan Greenberg ("Greenberg"), Bear Stearns' former Cha

ubsequent decline in value." In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 273 F. Supp. 2d 351, 363 (S.D.N.Y. 2003), aff'd, 396 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2005) (quoting Robbins v. Koger Props., Inc., 116 F.3d 1441, 1448 (11th Cir. 1997)). To the contrary, the facts show that Claimants' losses were caused by market forces.

IRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072 BRADLEY J. EDWARDS and PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, VS. ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. / DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ’S REDACTED MOTION TO MODIFY CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER Defenda

! JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, V. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA SERVED ON NON-PARTY JANE DOE NO. 3 Non-party Jane Doe 3, by and through unde

Cassell had something to hide. Accordingly, Dershowitz has failed to carry his heavy burden to justify sealing these presumptively-public documents. L DERSHOWITZ HAS NOT JUSTIFIED SEALING ALLEGED DEFAMATORY RECORDS THAT ARE INTEGRAL TO THIS DEFAMATION CASE. In his motion, Dershowitz never recounts the heavy b