Epstein Secrets

ea. There was a later unsuccessful effort to add (Jane Doe 3) and another woman (Jane Doe 4) as plaintiffs to that case.{' ?) The addition accused Alan Dershowitz of sexually abusing a minor, Jane Doe 3, provided by Epstein.Da31 The allegations against Dershowitz were stricken by the judge and eliminated from

fs to that case.{' ?) The addition accused Alan Dershowitz of sexually abusing a minor, Jane Doe 3, provided by Epstein.Da31 The allegations against Dershowitz were stricken by the judge and eliminated from the case because he said they were outside th intent of thepit to r the plea agreement.[Dilk351 A d

laintiffs to that case.{' ?) The addition accused Alan Dershowitz of sexually abusing a minor, Jane Doe

APP H SHAW DEFENDANT APPEARS Represented By: MS H SALVEMINI APPEARING AT PT ADELAIDE 14 Due Care - Basic Offence/Fail To Give. Personal Dctall lb REMANDED Officer On Request/Resist Polite/Fail Tb Comply With Direction - Alcotest/Breath Analysis PLEA: NO PLEA PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - TO CONTINUE (165470

[email protected], [email protected] Jack Alan Goldberger [email protected], nalanis®agwpa.c

ER re [220] Appeal of Magistrate Judge Order [218] to District Court, filed by Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate's Order is set aside and this case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with the directives of this Order. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 10/20/2010. (ir)

ORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED represented by Guy Alan Lewis Lewis Tein 3059 Grand Avenue Suite 340

fraudulent, Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [DE 11] is GRANTED. 2. This case shall be REMANDED to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, case No. 50 2008 CA 006596, for lack of subject matte

secute him without an indict- ment. See 1 Charles Alan Wright, Fed. Prac- tice & Procedure § 121, at 518

y are more ap- propriately ft to state factfinders and be- cause the involve hypothetical circum- stances.. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED. LYNNE, District Judge, dissenting: In my opinion the discussion and affirm- ance of the district court's denial of an injunction are inappropriat

n Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P

nt. We express no opinion as to the ad- missibility of any statements made by Wood either before or after the breach of the contract. REVERSED and REMANDED. C.A.I I (Fla.),1986. U.S. v. Wood 780 F.2d 929 O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 4 haps://web2.westlaw.com/pr