Epstein Secrets

Court has taken it upon itself to strike the impertinent factual details from the Rule 21 Motion and related filings, the Court concludes that Mr. Derschowitz's intervention in this case is unnecessary. Accordingly, his motion to intervene will be denied as moot.3 Regarding whether a show cause order shoul

Motion—and related filings—should be stricken from the record. Pending for this Court's consideration is a Motion for Limited Intervention filed by Alan M. Dershowitz, who seeks to intervene to "strike the outrageous and impertinent allegations made against him and [to] request[] a show cause order to the attorne

reasons recently briefed to the Court concerning Professor Dershowitz's identical argument, the position is without me

on is a Motion for Limited Intervention filed by Alan M. Dershowitz, who seeks to intervene to "strike

re "unjustified obstacles" or that the public will never have access to these documents -- reflect unjustified criticisms of the Protocol itself and the Second Circuit's decision in Brown, both of which fairly outline the legal process for parties and Non-Parties alike to be heard with respect to unsealing. Notably,

edacted, with the 21 exception of Does 1 and 2, Professor Dershowitz, and in 22 deposition testimony already unseale

1 and 2 should 8 be unsealed. 9 Additionally, Alan Dershowitz's name and information 10 identifyin

eir names in this case's documents. Accordingly, 7 the names and identifying information for Does 1 and 2 should 8 be unsealed. 9 Additionally, Alan Dershowitz's name and information 10 identifying him may be unsealed. By his letter at docket entry 11 1138, he has requested that redactions of his name in t

specific comment, personal identifying 20 information for all nonparty Does should be redacted, with the 21 exception of Does 1 and 2, Professor Dershowitz, and in 22 deposition testimony already unsealed by the Court of Appeals. 23 The other names of Does and identifying information 2.1 will remai

Messages involving the defendant. Portions of this document were redacted and released by the Second Circuit. So whatever happened with respect to the Second Circuit's release, we will abide by its ruling. 339. Response in opposition to the motion to compel. Unseal and redact the names, identifying information, a

LAINE MAXWELL, SHARON CHURCHER, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, PlaintiffiAppellee, Defendant-Appellant, Respondents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH MEDIA Intervenors. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 15-CV-

the nature of this case. 9 I think it's more like listing witnesses. So I would say that 10 the plaintiff should supply all residences. 11 The Dershowitz deposition will be produced under the 12 confidentiality provision. As I read what I've been given, 13 it's to be held in confidence and it will

dents, JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, DBA CERNOVICH M

Cr. 330 (AJN) (the "Criminal Action"). The information implicates Ms. Maxwell's right to due process and fairness in this civil action and affects the Second Circuit's review of the Court's unsealing order of July 23, 2020. Additionally, the information implicates her rights as a criminal defendant guaranteed unde

.us/35HFR8s. 4 Ronn Blitzer, Dershowitz Goes Off on Woman Who Made Underage Sex Allegations, LAW & CRIME (Dec. 4, 2018), https://bit.ly/2EASaYl. 5 Alan M. Dershowitz, Letter to the Editor: Article Misrepresented Dershowitz, THE HARVARD CRIMSON (Dec. 5, 2018), https://bit.ly/2S81Se5. 6 EFTA00092653 Case 1:19-c

de Underage Sex Allegations, LAW & CRIME (Dec. 4, 2018), https://bit.ly/2EASaYl. 5 Alan M. Dershowitz, Letter to the Editor: Article Misrepresented Dershowitz, THE HARVARD CRIMSON (Dec. 5, 2018), https://bit.ly/2S81Se5. 6 EFTA00092653 Case 1:19-cv-03377-LAP Document 101-1 Filed 12/20/19 Page 8 of 41 (

T OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Counte

e is totally fantasizing about me. She's made up the whole story. There is no truth to it." (t) August 12, 2019, in a press statement issued after the Second Circuit's ruling in Giuffre v. Maxwell: "She invented the false accusation against me only in 2014, when her lawyers `pressured' her to do so for financial r

redacted submissions. It did not request that the district court transmit any unredacted or sealed court submissions. Appeal No. 16-3945. Appellant Dershowitz moved to unseal various documents in August 2016; the district court denied the motion in November 2016. Appellant Cernovich moved to unseal the su

at the district court (or the appellees) unjustifiably delayed resolution of the unseal motions and its abuse of discretion in failing to adhere to the Second Circuit's "clear[]"3 precedent. We respectfully submit that neither conclusion warrants the extraordinary action being contemplated by the panel. A. The dist

en & Sir- cusa ("RMJS"), and others, principally Alan Garfinkel and Leigh Katzman, form- ing Katzman Ga

rrive at a just solution of a civil dispute." Lake Utopia Paper Ltd.'. Connelly Containers, Inc., 608 F.2d 928 (2d Cir.1979). Lake Utopia involved the Second Circuit's Civil Appeals Management Plan, which called for parties to engage in a conference before oral argument, to hopefully settle their dispute. The Circ